• Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    A quick reminder that aa is basically Erdogan’s personal propaganda channel. I’m not saying anything against this specific article. Just a reminder for the future.

    • breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Thanks for pointing this out!

      This article is terrible too though. The entire article is a tweet clarifying that the judgment doesn’t represent the official government position and then… random, unnamed Twitter users talking shit. The subheading is a quote from “social media user” (a well-known authority on such matters!). I can’t find the original comment. They don’t link to any of these comments. I wonder why!

      The second quote, attributed to “one Kenyan user” (though it’s just a pro-Palestinain/anti-Israeli account), is a post with 150 views and 10 likes. The final quote, by “another”, is from a post that has 25 views and zero likes. They’ve really got their finger on the pulse!

      They’re just finding randos to feed you the story Erdogan wants to tell you. Tellingly, Pakistani and Iranian propaganda channels are also quoting these nobodies too.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Unless the judge is the heir to the government, the word the headline should’ve used is “disavowed.” I understand English probably isn’t the journalist’s native language, but c’mon, if writing is your job you need to get it right.

    • DdCno1@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Maybe it’s intentional. I remember reading that spam mails with lots of mistakes in them filter out everyone but the intended target audience of idiots who fall for them. This is Turkey’s state propaganda outlet, basically their Al Jazeera, so it’s not that far-fetched to think that they are filtering out people who are naive enough to post and upvote this garbage publication.

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Even the Israeli judge said yes to some of the point and Uganda said No. Tells you alot about competence and questions their ethics.