• Big Mike@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because of those pesky human rights that mandate “freedom of religion” or whatever.

      • Big Mike@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean it kinda does with the whole “freedom of expression” thing it has.

        I could be wrong on this, but that’s how I interperted it.

          • Big Mike@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No clue about the constitution, since I am not american, but it would be logical to think that the religous can rule as long as they don’t break other human rights.