• Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you want to lawyer around about historical shit, you can, and I can’t stop you. But any decent human being with a fucking soul doesn’t care for your pedantic bullshit when there’s hundreds of innocent people dead on the ground.

          • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            If there is 6000 people in a square kilometre you can always blame the use of “human shields” to distract from the fact that you are bombing densely populated area and your “surgical strikes” are not that surgical.

          • الشسمو هاظ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            11 months ago

            Hmmm, there is more documented evidence of Israel using human shields (and having to make it “illegal” to keep using Palestinians as human shields but it still happens and many get away with it).

        • Synnr@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Ah, I’m “lawyering around about historical shit” (historical being within a lifetime) but I’m the one with a cold dead soul because hundreds of “the good people” who stole the land died, and you’re the one with a heart of gold who thinks it’s lol-worthy and likes to make jokes when tens of thousands of “the bad people” die fighting for their stolen land.

          Let me know when you want to attempt to argue in good faith, because as I said from the beginning I’m not well educated on the subject, and your tactics are failing.

          • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            And there you go, dehumanizing the victims and justifying their murder.

            • Synnr@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Are you trying to guess what my reply would be? If not, you seriously need to look in the mirror bud.

              Hamas is a terrorist organization. They are horrific and should all be taken care of… take that how you will. Palestinians and Israel is should be able to live in peace. This much is self evident and shouldn’t be up for debate like you’re trying to do.

              But Israel lobbing back over bombs and killing innocent civilians is the Spider-Man pointing at himself meme.

        • ReverseThePolarity@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          So if you encountered a criminal holding an innocent person hostage, you would shoot the hostage on the off chance that you might also hit the criminal. You would then shoot the paramedic trying to save the hostages’ life.
          Your version of the trolley problem must be pretty wack.

          • jcit878@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            you couldnt have a sillier interpretation of your own fantasy scenario.

            I would shoot for the criminal. Who, being the peice of shit he is, like Hamas, is likely to throw the hostage into the line of fire and whine about how much of a monster you are.

            You’re version of the trolley problem is as cooked as the wheels on woolies trollies