• someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Plenty of agricultural stuff you don’t want to share a roof with. And you want a hard bed that you can hose off.

    • MudMan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The Trafic in particular has a separated cabin and the floor of that thing is pretty much one layer of sheet metal between the wheels. You’re good on both counts.

      It does smell… eh… agricultural inside one of those after a while, of course. It’s kinda nostalgic for me at this point.

      For the really nasty stuff people here just get a trolley to hook up to a jeep or a tractor and a bit of patience. Or, you know, sealed containers. Trust me, people do haul a lot of smelly stuff and I haven’t seen anybody who owns an open bed pickup truck in my life. I know more people who moved stuff around with oxen than with pickup trucks. It works.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wouldn’t be able to pick up chem in it, and you’re welcome to throw a dead, half-eaten calf in your van, but I’d rather throw it in my truck bed and hose the contents of the intestines out later.

        • MudMan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Like I said, for the really nasty, loose stuff people would just throw an open bed trolley in the back of a different vehicle and do it that way.

          I don’t know what you carry, but I’m pretty sure you can do both of those things in a van if you have to. At most you may want to put a tarp underneath first. And you can hose it later. Again, I don’t think Americans are picturing what the back of a work van looks like or how it gets used. If you fully open the back and side doors at once you actually get direct access to more of the floor than you do in a pickup bed.

        • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ya, I don’t get why people get bogged down with the van thing. It’s some hollier than thou stuff. And I love my van.

          The problem with modern pickups is that they are too huge and used too often as commuter vehicles. And a v8 van would have the same issues. The pickup design is still better suited for a lot of things.

          • MudMan@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not holier than thou, I literally have never seen a pickup truck in my life outside of the times I’ve been in North America for work. I’m just trying to explain why.

            But then I just read the words “A v8 van”, so I don’t think that I’m gonna bridge this particular cultural divide here.

            • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well, then you probably are just unaware that small pickups used to be incredibly common, and a lot of people still have them, which is why your arguments sound pedantic.

              Similarly, there are both large and small vans. So, it does sound pretentious to act like a covered bed is so superior to an open bed. It’s just preference at that point.

              • MudMan@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I mean, I responded to somebody being annoyed by only having pickup options for farm work. I merely proposed the alternative.

                But it’s more than just preference, considering the OP was concerned about the lack of alternatives and I have never seen a person living in a rural area who owns a US-style pickup. There’s clearly a regional divide here, and from what I’m hearing from both sides none of us seem to be particularly aware of why. Beyond “American like big truck” or whatever.

                • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  We are talking about open beds and why they are useful. The size of trucks in the modern market is a separate issue. I agree there.

                  • MudMan@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Are we talking about that? Because what seems to happen up there is that the OP said they “want to purchase a ToddlerKiller4000. Short of inventing a time machine and traveling back to an era of car-sized rather than tank-sized pickups, my options are pretty slim”

                    And I suggested a van instead and apparently hit the secret trap card of culture clash for today, which I wasn’t expecting at all. I thought we’d just joke around about how Americans like their work vehicles to look huge and rugged and maybe feel all superior for a bit about sensible white vans. I didn’t think that the concept of a truck bed having a roof would be the great Atlantic rift.

          • ikidd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And I’m thinking, all things being equal, putting a metal roof over my cargo area would just add weight anyway. I guess it’s not built for towing like my 1-ton is, so maybe that’s a weight savings, but it’s also not built for towing which would make it unusable for most farmwork.

            • MudMan@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              We have tractors for that.

              What I’m starting to realize is that despite Americans seemingly being car-first in so many facets the entire narrative around the humongous cars seems to be to have a one-size-fits-all car that is supposed to do everything. Wanna carry manure? Pickup truck. Wanna carry kids to school? Pickup truck. Seemingly want to drag a plow? Pickup truck.

              A person with what we’d call a “farm”, or at least a person in a rural area who has animals and plants vegetables in a field (I also think the concept of “farm” is different) would instead have different, cheaper vehicles for all of those. A small tractor head, or a big tractor if you have a lot of land and it’s worth the money, then a van, then a small car, then Jeep or a Range Rover if you need to go offroad and tow a lot.

              Do Americans in rural areas just have a different pickup for each person working there instead? That seems insane.

              I was honestly not thinking this conversation would reveal one of the biggest challenges to visualize the logic of a different culture I’ve had this week.

              • ikidd@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh, we have tractors, all right. I could take a picture for you out in our equipment yard that would have 60 tons of tractors in it. I think the scale of this all might be where the disconnect comes from.

                When I say, “pick up chem” I’m talking maybe a couple of 1000L totes that would be forked on the back, and that’s just a makeup order because I was short on foliar fert during spraying, the main part of the order came on a semi-trailer. They aren’t going in a van, even something like a Sprinter, which I’d be surprised if it’s any more fuel efficient than a pickup. When I pull a trailer, it’s a 30’ flatdeck gooseneck, perhaps with a 7630 tractor chained to it or a 25’ horse trailer with 16 steers on it. I’m going to drive those to an auction market 150 km away, and while I’m gone, the other people on the farm need to do similar things, so yes, we all have trucks because picking and choosing which vehicle you take to hope that it’s the right size when you get out in a field to do something, and realize you needed to grab a pickup is silly. We don’t spend money (and the imbued energy implied) on 4 sizes/types of vehicles that might just barely do the job that particular time.

                We usually get 8-10 Europeans staying with us over the summer on workstay programs and even the rural ones have no concept of how farming is done in Canada and the US, and come away with a completely different view of farming life here. I’d say you would be surprised and might come away with a different opinion than what you’ve experienced yourself.

                I know you’re contemptuous of us and how we do things, but perhaps it’s the same thing you’d find yourself doing if you dealt with the same challenges.

                • MudMan@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I actually fully agree that scale is a big part of the disconnect here. Even where I’m from, people in rural areas from the north and south are talking about wildly different scales when they talk about “farming”. Hell, for my standards, the scope you describe doesn’t count as “farming” at all, it’s a full-on industrial exploitation. May as well call an Ikea factory an “atelier”.

                  This isn’t news to me, in that I’ve been around all those places enough to understand the difference between their respective scales, but I’ve crucially not actively done work in the others. I have no idea of the kind of use cases that would justify a fleet of pickup trucks rather than specialized vehicles. I know that no size of exploitation chooses to go that way locally, nationally or eeven continentally, so there are definintely alternatives. I don’t know that I’d say I’m “contemptuous”, though. More “amusedly snarky”, perhaps.

                  Also worth noting that the post I was originally responding to was specifically bemoaning that they couldn’t find smaller pickup truck options, so I doubt they were worrying about that type of haul.

                • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  They don’t care. You can say that you make a living using a vehicle that works for you, for good reason, and that you prefer it to alternatives. And their answer will be “No, you don’t.” Their head is that far up their own ass. So much so that you are now involved in industrial exploitation, apparently. Top hat and monocle, too, I’m sure.

          • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This particular thread started with op saying they wanted a small truck. A lot of people out here are fighting ghosts with strong car shape superiority complexes.