cosmicrookie@lemmy.world to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoEnvironmental protester halt the world championship in cycling... one of the best alternatives to fuel driven transportation....lemmy.worldimagemessage-square162fedilinkarrow-up1623arrow-down1131
arrow-up1492arrow-down1imageEnvironmental protester halt the world championship in cycling... one of the best alternatives to fuel driven transportation....lemmy.worldcosmicrookie@lemmy.world to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square162fedilink
minus-squarewoelkchen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down4·1 year ago The event itself must have a lot carbon footprint. Same is true for almost every form of entertainment but it’s a drop in the bucket compared to the truly big polluters.
minus-squarenal@lib.lgbtlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down3·1 year agoSources of entertainment have - by definition - more viewers and attention than Exxon’s office building.
minus-squarewoelkchen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·1 year ago Sources of entertainment have - by definition - more viewers and attention than Exxon’s office building. I always find it odd when people claim that something is by definition. Whose definition? Anyway, this event is promoting cycling and disrupting a cycling event does nothing to help further promoting any form of cycling.
Same is true for almost every form of entertainment but it’s a drop in the bucket compared to the truly big polluters.
Sources of entertainment have - by definition - more viewers and attention than Exxon’s office building.
I always find it odd when people claim that something is by definition. Whose definition?
Anyway, this event is promoting cycling and disrupting a cycling event does nothing to help further promoting any form of cycling.