alphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoAmerican XL bully dogs to be banned after attacks, Rishi Sunak sayslocknews.sky.comexternal-linkmessage-square257fedilinkarrow-up1416arrow-down138
arrow-up1378arrow-down1external-linkAmerican XL bully dogs to be banned after attacks, Rishi Sunak sayslocknews.sky.comalphacyberranger@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square257fedilink
minus-squareferret@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down4·1 year agoTechnically it is disengenuous to say statistically and then make up a statistic
minus-squarestarman2112@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down14·edit-21 year agoLiterally all I’m saying is that the vast majority of pit bulls aren’t violent. I fucking said I’m in favor of spaying and neutering the breed out of existence because the few that do become violent are excessively dangerous.
minus-squarethemajesticdodo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·1 year ago Assuming an average lifespan of roughly 10 years, there’s a roughly 1 in 1,000 chance that a given pit bull will ever attack a human or animal. So 1 in every 1000 will attack a human? Is that actually a good argument for pit bulls?
minus-squareHonytawk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoIts like saying 95% of catholic priests have not molested a child, meaning 1 in 20 definitely have, lol.
Technically it is disengenuous to say statistically and then make up a statistic
Literally all I’m saying is that the vast majority of pit bulls aren’t violent. I fucking said I’m in favor of spaying and neutering the breed out of existence because the few that do become violent are excessively dangerous.
So 1 in every 1000 will attack a human? Is that actually a good argument for pit bulls?
Its like saying 95% of catholic priests have not molested a child, meaning 1 in 20 definitely have, lol.