Outside of the many publications, conferences, symposia, and discussions in the lay media on this topic over multiple decades, they’ve been completely ignoring it. Shameful.
Outside of the many publications, conferences, symposia, and discussions in the lay media on this topic over multiple decades, they’ve been completely ignoring it. Shameful.
Your comment is wiggida-wiggida-wiggida wack.
Waste of money. Build the chair to go up and down instead.
David Puddy?
The “weak spot” is an enhancer region about 290 Kbp from the gene ETS2 mentioned elsewhere in the comments. The haplotype associated with IBS leads to overepression of the gene. They did some nice cell and molecular work to confirm the enhancer’s effect on the gene and the genes effect on inflammation response.
I came to complain about the headline (An amazing footage). Then I read part of the article. Holy balls that’s bad writing.
Minutes after completion, I felt an aching, throbbing, stabbing sensation on one side of my lower abdomen.
This is what happens when you have sex with a person vaccinated about 72 days prior, according to the nut jobs described in this article.
Best I can tell from the image is that people with triple-helix left-handed DNA should be resistant to Alzheimer’s. So far every patient who has died from Alzheimer’s has been shown to have standard double-helix right-handed DNA in their genomes and also not from outer space.
Yep. My wording wasn’t great. But what I meant was “according to how this study was described in the headline.”
Exactly. Science reporting is pretty awful, but in many cases the scientists enable that.
The point of my other facetious comment is that this is not how anyone, scientists included, would define the age of a particular person’s coffee. Your coffee was grown and harvested recently. The species can be dated back a half million years. Conflating the plants and the species is misleading at best.
It’s OK, I’m at least 100,000 years old according to this study.
Thank goodness the joke came with an explanation to suck the fun out of it.
These are addressed in the article. This is a test to see how it works. It’s not production scale and the scientists working on it hope it will never need to be.
While cutting carbon emissions are the best strategy, we should also look at other ways to stave off catastrophe. That includes if we do cut emissions but after the tipping point has been reached.
My concern is it is a game of diminishing returns. But you’re right, repeated treatments would help and perhaps be necessary. This assumes that when the virus is latent there is no leakiness to that. If it spreads between cells a bit between treatments, then it could be a game of whack-a-mole.
The problem is if you leave a single provirus, HIV can return. It’s different than needing to supply a functional form of a protein to enough cells that the body benefits. You can get high delivery rates with enough effort. But 100%?
I prefer my insulin straight from people. I will never use GMO insulin!
Maybe it should have been Target Archery to avoid confusion?