No one said at all that AI used “reason” to talk people out of a conspiracy theory. In fact I would assume it’s incredibly unlikely since AI in general is not reasonable.
Creator of LULs (a script which helps links to point to your instance)
Come say hi here or over at https://twitch.tv/AzzuriteTV :) I like getting to know more people :)
Play games with me: https://steamcommunity.com/id/azzu
No one said at all that AI used “reason” to talk people out of a conspiracy theory. In fact I would assume it’s incredibly unlikely since AI in general is not reasonable.
Semi-unrelated question: I’ve watched Star Trek Voyager with my gf, she doesn’t know any other Trek. I don’t think we want to watch TOS, but will probably continue with TNG and DS9 next.
Do you need to know the TOS characters like Kirk, Spock etc before watching their movies, or are they adequately introduced in the movies so you can watch them as someone completely ignorant?
It’s funny just reading the headline… Experts warn that Chinese research is getting good? Like, is that a bad thing, or why do we have to be warned about it xD isn’t research in general just good
Of course, the assumption was that the senior was actually competent and non-malicious, which may of course be false.
The question is, was nothing done because they’re incompetent or because they don’t care about the job and were able to do nothing with a “good” excuse
I’m sorry, but distinguishing between different concepts is forbidden here. You go straight to jail.
It’s almost like language is inconsistent and evolving
There’s no answer to this. All can do what you want in varying degrees. With Opal you can compile Ruby to JavaScript for your frontend for example. Or with electron you can use JavaScript as desktop application.
You gotta say much more about the actual requirements to make any meaningful comparison.
I would really like to know what’s the resulting materials after the breaking down, but the article doesn’t say :(
But that’s what I meant, you can reduce the main content width to increase readability, but the secondary content like languages would still be fine to fill the now empty space.
I was so confused when they removed the sidebar and put it into icons.
Yes, replace the space on the right that is being used right now with… nothing. And let’s take away horizontal space instead and make you remember what the icons mean… Why?
This is such a ridiculous comment. I can literally go on Amazon and buy some helium right now. You really think if that’s possible, a cutting edge research lab would run out of the stuff?
Sure, it’s limited and getting scarcer, but no one’s running out yet.
I mean flying cars are basically just helicopters.
I’m not an expert in formal languages at all… But when I read your question, I was like “really?”
I mean yeah, when we talk about a program’s purpose we don’t often say “it verifies an input”. But what is verifying an input really? Deciding if a statement is true or false. And if you really want to, you can deconstruct almost anything any program does into components of that.
Should this UI element be displayed? Input: page visit, user, users preferences. Output: reject/confirm. Should the UI element be red? Should it be green?
And so on and so on for literally everything. Yeah, formal language theory is not strictly required for doing that, but it still is the foundation that is abstracted away. Same as you don’t need to know about the theory behind mathematical operations and classes and sets to do 1+1.
Usually, unless there’s a specific reason to rewrite a project in another language (like performance, maintainability requirements, skillsets of available developers, dead ecosystem, etc) I wouldn’t do it. Java is perfectly suited for your goal of “least amount of setup required for future contributors” and many contributors will know Java well.
In general, it is much much easier to make existing code readable than to create new code already readable while maintaining the same feature set. So if you have a problem with FLTK, I would just switch to another GUI library. In the process of changing your code, you’ll actually start to understand how to separate layers of concern. Because theoretically, if your code were set up properly, it should be relatively easy to replace GUI libraries. It is likely not set up properly with lots of interdependency between UI concerns and application logic.
Netbeans is also a pretty terrible IDE imo. With an open source project, you can apply for the open source license of intelliJ, which is the gold standard.
That being said. If you really don’t want to use Java anymore just to learn something new, I would suggest a JVM language that can even use Java dependencies, like Kotlin or Clojure. Especially Clojure will teach you a lot of new things that will make you more productive as a programmer. However, every language will come with tooling-related quirks, it will be impossible for you to find a language that doesn’t have any problems at all like you describe. Why do you think there are so many languages in the first place? Because people didn’t like something about the other ones, often also tooling related.
If an answer was downvoted on NoStupidQuestions, was it too stupid or a serious reply to a joke question?
You’re ✨✨special✨✨
But Protego is something that you can simply have up around you whenever.
As far as I know, the Protego spell protects against physical forces. The reason no one uses projectiles (they certainly could catapult stuff around with spells as well) is probably because it’s common knowledge that it does nothing.
One thing that people didn’t mention yet: this is the behavior that made him (stay) a billionaire. You don’t get to be one by being nice and non-exploitative.