Pacifism is an ideology centered on political change through nonviolence. Maybe you didn’t explicitly say it, but you might as well have. Can you provide a source on violence being a result of political breakdown and not intrinsic to politics itself? How do current regimes uphold their power?

Politics is, more or less, how decisions are made in groups. Making a decision doesn’t preclude violence. Wars are political and their entire point is violence. Colonialism was foundational to the politics of the last 3+ centuries and it was incredibly violent. Besides vibes, what evidence do you have to support the claim that politics aren’t violent?

All of human political activity boils down to violence. If pacifism were a legitimate strategy then we wouldn’t be in our current situation.

They’re putting chemicals in the water, making the frickin whales literate!

Don’t worry, I had a bit too much to drink last night so it’s covered

I mean, you’re not wrong. But I’d rather remain in denial. I’m not old enough to avoid the draft yet lol

Conscripting and openly killing one another* as in us on russia or china type shit would be more fair I guess haha

Once some major players start conscripting people I think it’d be reasonable to call it WW3. This is the preamble

Violent J in shambles rn

Wrap it up folks, no more schools and hospitals. We’re only bombing daycares and libraries now

They have very a similar flavor, so much so that id say they’re basically interchangeable

On 20 February 2023, he condemned Putin for “destroying” Russia’s own future “just to make our country look bigger on the map” and said that Russia must end its occupation of Ukraine and recognise Ukraine’s borders as they were established in 1991 after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Navalny also said Russia would have to pay post-war reparations to Ukraine and called for an international investigation into war crimes, saying: “Tens of thousands of innocent Ukrainians have been murdered and pain and suffering have befallen millions more.”

He’s a lib with an anti-immigrant and nationalist streak, and I’m no fan of his. But a cursory glance at Wikipedia shows that he’s 100% against the war in Ukraine. So much so that he thinks crimea should be returned to Ukraine and that Russia should pay reparations. Whether he’d actually stand by that if he were in power is questionable, again, he’s a lib. But as far as we know, he’s about as pro-ukraine as a Russian can be

Dibs

Are they gonna kick their own asses for protesting or is the general population allowed to get a few pot shots and tear gas canisters in this time?

I’m all for truly weird shit. Thanks!

What’s the book? I haven’t seen this before

Forgot what the thread was originally about lol, my bad. I skimmed the article, I’m working and haven’t given it a proper read yet. I see why you were saying all that now, that’s on me and I apologize.

To say they’re the same is incorrect as they are different compounds. But if we’re judging them on their effects on the mind and body, taken the same way and in the same doses; they illicit a nearly identical response. If you accidentally took a meth pill instead of Adderall, it’s likely you would only notice minor differences if you noticed anything

And what part of that mentioned anything about sourcing meth from the streets? As far as my intentions are concerned, I was speaking strictly pure, prescribed methamphetamine, taken as prescribed. That could’ve been inferred from context since the comment I was replying to was about how methamphetamine is sometimes prescribed for ADHD. The conversation wasn’t about street drugs and until you commented, no one brought it up

Im not telling people to buy crank from some dude down the street instead of going to the pharmacy for their Adderall. You’re just putting words in my mouth and getting mad at them.

However, I was misremembering a study I read a few years ago. Outside of in vitro and rat studies, I couldn’t find anything measuring the pharmacological effects of Adderall and meth. I should’ve said behavioural and physiological instead. It was intranasal instead of oral as well, for what that’s worth. The behavioral effects are essentially identical and there are very minor differences in effects on heart rate and blood pressure. I will be correcting my comment after I reply to you.

Turns out I was misremembering a study I read a few years back. It was intranasal, not oral. They’re still incredibly similar in their effects at the same dose. Here’s the study. And a vice article about the study with commentary from the doctor who conducted it.