Unless I’m mistaken, if you remove the LGBTQ community everybody that left… Is cis persons. As in general “techy” world, most of the person using fediverse (and it’s currently changing rapidly, which is good) is male.
I may very well be mistaken, but the way this sentence is constructed make it feels like one information is being phrased in a way that fitting a certain point of view.
Anyway, I’m probably over analysing, as usual.
Euuuuh… Is it me or is some parts of the article setting up/opposing LGBTQ+ against non-lgbtq?
“One of the interesting dynamics of the discussion so far is so much of the resistance to Meta has come from queer and trans people, and that most of the loudest supporters of Meta in the fediverse are cis guys.”
This sentence may be technicaly right, but it’s sooooo stupid mostly interpretation.
Edit: wrong and uncalled for
Starting from there, the article seems to be as much about “us va them” than threads and meta…
As far as I know,
philosybinPsilocybin is currently tested for a lot of applications, but none linked to Elzeimer/dementia.Would you have an article/paper to point me towards?