We already know that it does. But now we have something that reliably will be able to modify that factor. Actually seems like a fairly good study.
We already know that it does. But now we have something that reliably will be able to modify that factor. Actually seems like a fairly good study.
I’m not positive that is not just a way to make it more palatable to that class. There’s a very easy connection to make with obesity and it’s related diseases, depression, and unemployment. If you’re trying to do public health with a national health organization, you want to reduce the load of those chronic disease diseases.
Your misconstruing the statement. Fascism is a way for insecure men to feel powerful. These men are feeling insecure due to lack of job prospects, lack of honest to God to physical insecurity, and that also makes them less desirable to potential mates.
The way to protect against fascism is to ensure proper addressing of Maslow‘s-goddamn-hierarchy of needs. Endstage, capitalism leads to fascism, but it has to secure itself in spreading racism and sexism.
As seriously as all violent right - wing movements- very.
But it has been recently presented as an either or position: oppose Russian aggression OR oppose Neo-nazis in Ukraine. We can easily do both.
Was it ketamine or was it MDMA? I know that the studies for MDMA were flawed and bit and did not meet muster.
Is there an issue with bias? Always. We are dealing with humans. But I know that if the pharm companies get to have them all approved we’d be in trouble.
If you are in Most states, you can have treatment with ketamine. ~190 a month, last I checked.
Covered by insurance, nope.
It is slow because there needs to be enough data to show enough of a benefit with a low enough risk to be given approval.
I believe it was Utah who has already done some work on this and showed that it was very successful and reducing ER use and police interaction between the same individuals getting housing
So, the goal is to erode support for a better option (not a good or best option) so that the killing can accelerate and spill into more countries? Having her in office gives more possibility to influence and change policy. Trump would be a spiteful response, most likely.
We live in a crappy reality.
What is the goal?
Are you not clear that this is definitely going to be dramatically worse if Trump gets back in office? No one is Talking about abandoning Trump, so it makes it very questionable.
Unfortunately, what we have had the past two presidential election cycles has been harm mitigation. FPTP SUCKS and we need to all get active in local politics to change that to the next best option: ranked choice. And maybe get rid of the electoral college.
‘Who?’
As you edited your comment, I will too.
I know of and respect the man- I am a total NASA fanboy. The issue is he does not have general name recognition and they have very little time to get things out there.
Having a scientist in the White House would be amazing.
Exasperated and sarcastic with a dose of compassion fatigue.
Bingo. I’m from a similar state, and it was awful how they would actually defend the ones that were destroying their land and their health.
The reason these places have all the producers of the carcinogens is because they’re poor and have no political power., And they have historically been predominantly black.
Who cares. They are just poor.
Kind of a weird article. The second part reads like an indictment of both urban areas and of diversity.
Also, it is an ad riddled mess of a website.
Edit: the more I look at this site the more suspicious I am becoming. No whois entry, way back machine has nothing much. I’d be careful to trust this site, folks.
And pardoned as soon as T gets in the oval…