It’s kind of malpractice for Biden not to immediately take advantage of his newly confirmed Presidential immunity. Embarrassing really.

Man. You know it has to have happened at least once that a living person was embalmed anyway because the embalmer was just too busy to notice.

The next time the gas stove discourse comes up, consider that maybe certain interests will benefit from everyone having to buy new induction ranges.

Too much avocado toast.

For the reasons I mentioned previously, it’s not at all clear which outcome would be worse. So, your premise is flawed. Regardless, you haven’t explained how voting for the alleged lesser of two evils is strategic. What kind of message does it send to both the DNC and RNC that a candidate can actively support a genocide and still get reelected? What message does it send to the world for us to keep a president like Biden in office? What is the goal of that kind of strategy?

What on Earth is “voting strategically” supposed to mean individual voters in US Presidential elections? Arriving at polling places early? Voting by mail? Or do you mean something illicit like voting early and often?

So, the Biden campaign is only relying on fervently anti-Trump voters? That’s a terrible strategy.

So then the strategy is to shame anyone who isn’t fervently anti-Trump into changing their mind? How is that supposed to work given the Trump era policies that are still in place or the incumbent administration’s material and rhetorical support for the Israeli’s genocidal persecution of the Palestinians? If people want to avoid shame, then not voting for either of the contenders, or at all, seems like the best move for them.

The strategy is pretty obviously to vote and advocate against the worse option.

That is just voting and having an opinion, not really a strategy. What is the incumbent campaign’s strategy for reelection? Are they just hoping that enough voters will see it your way (I presume), in spite of supporting the genocide as well as the policies that more or less haven’t changed since the previous administration?

Oh, no. I mean, if that were true, that one outcome is decidedly worse than the other, how would it even be a contest? In any case, I don’t understand how any of this is strategic.

I know who is running for president. What is the strategy that voters should follow to get their preferred candidate elected?

What is the strategy?

Please be more specific.

I must have missed the memo.

There’s a strategy‽

Yeah, guess what I won’t be doing in November. Pale Man-ass President.

Good people who believe in a free Palestine are not the ones who should be setting themselves on fire.

No. Organized labor exists in spite of the government. For example, in the US, sympathy strikes are illegal. Many jurisdictions have so called right-to-work laws which weaken unions. A union is its members, not the laws to which it’s subjugated.

For most of the history of capitalism, and in many cases still to this day, organized labor and various labor actions have been illegal, but it still happens.

As members of the same class, workers interests should be more or less aligned and disagreements should be mostly minor. Differences can be settled by compromise or people can withdraw from the organization if not.