Moved from @Crul@lemmy.world
Fixed, thanks!
I dind’t saw them, thanks!
I edited the post with the english versions.
Source: Help – The Jenkins
Yep, that’s why I added the twitter source too.
Source: https://www.commitstrip.com/2015/04/27/the-eye-opener-commit/
Also on twitter:
How long would you say it took you before getting a fundamental understanding?
I would say years, as with any complex activity.
I’m still forgetting things I learned 3 or even 4 times like how to do a for each loop.
You can forget in 2 different ways:
You will forget-1 everything which you don’t use on a daily basis. That’s what internet is for. Forgetting in the 2-nd sense is much more rare and you should do something if that’s the case.
all of it feels too advanced and I get lost on how to begin
This is a bias most of us have, you overlook how easy is for you to do things that previously were impossible and focus on how hard are the things you still don’t know how to do. And computing is so complex right now that there always be “infinite” things you don’t know.
Try showing what you know to someone who doesn’t know how to code and you will get an idea of how much you have learnt :).
Anyway, I don’t really have good advice :/, just wanted to confirm that what you feel is expected. Good luck!
I think you’re confusing “arbitrarily large” with “infinitely large”. See Wikipedia Arbitrarily large vs. (…) infinitely large
Furthermore, “arbitrarily large” also does not mean “infinitely large”. For example, although prime numbers can be arbitrarily large, an infinitely large prime number does not exist—since all prime numbers (as well as all other integers) are finite.
For integers I disagree (but I’m not a mathematician). The set of integers with infinite digits is the empty set, so AFAIK, it has probability 0.
Doesn’t it depends on whether we are talking about real or integer numbers?
EDIT: I think it also works with p-adic numbers.
I also think that’s correct… if we are talking about real numbers.
People are probably thinking about integers. I’m not sure about OP.
EDIT: I think it also works with p-adic numbers.
That rings a bell
My not-very-helpful 2 cents: this is how it worked on reddit and kind of what expected for lemmy. But there could be a setting to change the behavior.
Non-expert answer (those who know more, please correct): only public content is (needs to be) federated. That’s (one of the reasons) why you cannot log in with the same account on different servers. Only the server you are registered in stores your private account data (AFAIK).
Great points. I agree.
A proper working implementation for the general case is still far ahead and it would be much complex than this experiment. Not only it will need the usual frame-to-frame temporal coherence, but it will probably need to take into account info from potentially any frame in the whole video in order to be consistent with different camera angles of the same place.
that’s weird. it’s actually a pretty useful feature, but it’s odd they’d add it to old reddit before new reddit, considering it’s basically deprecated. maybe it’s just an a/b rollout and i don’t have it yet
Sorry, I think I didn’t explain my self correctly. That feature it’s a very old one, it has been on old reddit since I remember. It has also worked on new reddit at some point, see the screenshot below from a comment I posted 6 months ago:
On the default frontend there is a button on the home page:
https://lemmy.ml/create_community
EDIT: Some instances have restricted community creation. It works on lemm.ee (if you are logged in): https://lemm.ee/create_community
Thanks for the info!
I crossposted this to (what I considered) the relevant communities, where I added that as an edit.