I just got some idea yesterday regarding impl blocks, ready to be my respondent?

I had a big impl block with 4 levels of indentation, so I cut the block, and replaced

impl InputList {
    //snip
}

with mod impl_inputlist; and moved the impl block to a new file, and did not indent anything inside that block.

The advantage this has over just not indenting the impl block in place, is that people will have difficulty distinguishing between what’s in the block and what’s outside, and that’s why the impl was moved to its own exclusive file, impl_inputlist.rs

Maybe I am overstressing indentation. Ss there something wrong with my setup that prevents me from accepting 4-space indentation?

I use:

Editor: Neovide

Font: “FiraCode Nerd Font Mono:h16” (16px fonts are addicintg)

Monitor: 1366x768, 18.5 inch, 10+ years old, frankenstein-ly repaired Samsung monitor.

Distance: I sit at about 40-60 Cm from my monitor.

That leaves me with a 32x99 view of code excluding line numbers and such.

Formatters are off-topic for this, styles come first, formatters are developed later.

My other reply:

How about this one? it more closely mirrors the switch example:

match suffix {
'G' | 'g' => mem -= 30,
'M' | 'm' => mem -= 20,
'K' | 'k' => mem -= 10,
_ => {},
}

How about this other one? it goes as far as cloning the switch example’s indentation:

match suffix {
'G' | 'g' => {
	mem -= 30;
       }
'M' | 'm' => {
	mem -= 20;
       }
'K' | 'k' => {
	mem -= 10;
       }
_ => {},
}

How about this one? it more closely mirrors the switch example:

match suffix {
'G' | 'g' => mem -= 30,
'M' | 'm' => mem -= 20,
'K' | 'k' => mem -= 10,
_ => {},
}

How about this other one? it goes as far as cloning the switch example’s indentation:

match suffix {
'G' | 'g' => {
	mem -= 30;
        }
'M' | 'm' => {
	mem -= 20;
        }
'K' | 'k' => {
	mem -= 10;
        }
_ => {},
}

A single match statement inside a function inside an impl is already 4 levels of indentation.

How about this?

The preferred way to ease multiple indentation levels in a switch statement is to align the switch and its subordinate case labels in the same column instead of double-indenting the case labels. E.g.:

switch (suffix) {
case 'G':
case 'g':
        mem <<= 30;
        break;
case 'M':
case 'm':
        mem <<= 20;
        break;
case 'K':
case 'k':
        mem <<= 10;
        /* fall through */
default:
        break;
}

I had some luck applying this to match statements. My example:

let x = 5;

match x {
5 => foo(),
3 => bar(),
1 => match baz(x) {
	Ok(_) => foo2(),
	Err(e) => match maybe(e) {
		Ok(_) => bar2(),
		_ => panic!(),
		}
	}
_ => panic!(),
}

Is this acceptable, at least compared to the original switch statement idea?

Immediately recognized that experiment.

After searching your comment history for the string: “Doods” (all case) I have something to tell you: git off social media, it took me minutes of flipping pages to reach 5 month old comments before surrendering; I do feel like I know you as well.

Regarding the general feeling, I experience a similar thing with someone else:

@PanArab@lemmy.ml, who is noticeable for having one of the few Arabic names on Lemmy, تحريرها كلها ممكن (freeing it all is possible) and for being the moderator of !israelicrimes@lemmy.ml, and for being from Saudi Arabia, we could tell that because:

a) He has its flag on his account.

b) He put a picture of an expensive car on top of it, further proving he is from Saudi Arabia (لا مؤاخذة) (Sorry for teasing you)

Edit: he apparently moderates many other things as well.

What does that even mean?

Didn’t eat it, have to wait for sunset.

Probably tastes the same as other cheap options, they rarely differ in taste.

Edit: I am really bad at tasting things, but I don’t think it tasted different from what I expected.

Produced by Sasco food industries.

Purely for this post.

Worse, they are one eyed monster thingies with hair horns on the back of their heads and mouth looking mustaches!!!

Excuse me, the first 3 quoted paragraphs are made twice.

So decided to take revenge on the Christians/Europeans by starving the Muslims/Arabs? Yeah that makes sense. (I am not insulting your picture of choice I am insulting Isreal, I am sure you’ll understand)

Picture source please.

I shouldn’t be replying to this as I am just as ignorant, but the last I heard of Iran is it has bombed US camps in Iraq as retaliation to the US-British attack on Yemen. (Normal Iranian behaviour if you ask me)

I mean the Palestinian population won’t need all that space after they’re done with them. (This is a joke based on Palestine’s population pre and theoretical post war, and is an exaggeration)

I stopped caring after ‘most moral military’, and reading after ‘Arabs doing so’.

I’m starting to remember things, thanks for reminding me, China is (was) used as an example of something being extremely far away where I live so it’s easy to forget. (A saying of sorts)

To summerize: the European governments suck, and the US is originally UK related, so it sucks by extension.

The Arab leaders are controlled by the aforementioned governments, so they suck as well.

The Asian governments are…well…they never did anything that bad in comparasion*, but I don’t follow Asian news so I can’t confirm.

The African governments and South American ones are too poor to afford a genocide.

Australia is too far from everything else to cause a genocide.

*Invading Ukraine is nothing compared to Europe being the source of most -or at least middle-eastern & African & south Asian- genocides throughout history.

Would you go to hell instead of me if I do that? (to rephrase it, would you take responsibility?) (you can’t)