![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/5d5a78b8-d06b-4909-92e0-b779a5038d25.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/d3d059e3-fa3d-45af-ac93-ac894beba378.png)
From my experience, most of the time they’re healthier too!
A lot of store-brand products either don’t use as much sugar, or salt or saturated fats then their big brand counter parts.
I am not so much disappointed as I am blinded with rage.
From my experience, most of the time they’re healthier too!
A lot of store-brand products either don’t use as much sugar, or salt or saturated fats then their big brand counter parts.
Yeah that’s the perfect way to describe my English in general ^^.
At whom is this aimed at?
I don’t care, you’re not to use static!
So burn her in her sleep, like the rest of us, and move on!
Is it fair that I have to post a source when someone criticizing doesn’t?
If you’re trying to debunk a myth or call someone’s BS, then yes a source should be your opening statement. Is it fair? No. Is it necessary? Absolutely.
With all that said thank you for providing the source. A very well written one it was. I am going to debunk this myth now too, if and when I see it.
Context and source?
deleted by creator
Well as long as it’s between consenting adults I don’t really care.
So … did he make it?
Also, is it even confirmed he was black? I mean Algerian people are not exactly black. Could be wrong though. Don’t know if there are any ancient scripts describing him.
Does this actually mean anything? Or is it just virtue signaling?
I guess we’ll take the L.
And I appreciate you for that ^^
That’s my point though. Justly or unjustly so, it is a controversial topic. So you need to convince conservatives otherwise. And boy oh boy, I think that task is even above UBI’s paygrade 🙃.
Well if UBI is indeed a safety net, than it’s really just extended wellfare at that point. Seeing how wellfare is already a quite controversial topic. I do not see this going through political-wise. Unless there is an absolute massive wave of unemployment by the effects of automisation. Which could unify both ends of the political spectrum on this topic.
I am on your side. But I just don’t see this realistically happening (right now).
The only way I can see this working is maybe with some sort of robo-tax (The more robots they uses, the higher their taxes). But right now it feels like chasing cars.
How do they plan to finance this?
Didn’t know I was doing a cancer speed-run.