What does it take to please You? Break Your rules, and you fall. Follow them, and you still lose! Doesn’t matter whether you’re a sinner! Doesn’t matter whether you’re a saint. Nobody can win, so what’s the point? What’s the bloody point?
No – that makes no sense.
If you don’t know something is there, how would you know you have to cast a spell to reveal it?
Surely you can only cast a spell on something you know is there to make it visible, not on something you don’t know is there.
Because if you don’t know it is there, how would you know it is there to cast a spell on it?
To cast a spell on something, you have to know there is something on which to cast the spell.
You have to be able to see something to cast a spell at it.
So…
Even if you include the rest of The DA or even the rest of The Order, I’d still take the Predator.
Also with music by John Williams.
There is a definite pattern developing here :)
Gremlins. And Anna & The Apocalypse.
Two films that have quite a lot in common
Little kid get abandoned by his family.
An adult gets set on fire at one point.
Another adult suffers a lot of pain due to a kid.
There’s a creepy old guy that you don’t know whether they are good or evil until the end.
I suspect it was something to do with Grindelwald and their “adventures”. Or it might be Grindelwald and the fight that got baby Sis killed.
Hermioneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
Well that just makes me not want to watch it at all.
Yeah – you REALLY should have watched Deathly Hallows 1 & 2. You kind of missed the entire point of the series if you skipped the end.
It’s like watching “It’s a Wonderful Life” and turning it off before the end.
So either you entirely missed the point or you have written an entire post to take the piss out of this forum.
1 – I have a surprising amount of imagination. More than I need, to be honest. 2 – Because villains CLEARLY don’t react to events with the reactions of “normal, sensible people”. If villains reacted with common sense, then they wouldn’t try to blow up the fucking world every two minutes. They would talk it through. They would sit down with the good guys, or go to therapy. 3 – See 1, but substitute “fiction” for “imagination” 4 – Good for you. I am sure your parents are very proud of you. Unless you’re an orphan, then I apologise for bringing up your parents. 5 – Luke wanted to join The Empire, not the resistance. What do you think “Transmit my application to the academy” meant? He was signing up to be a good little fascist just like all the other fascists.
I say this with as much respect as possible – which is very little (if I am honest) – but do you not understand how fiction works?
If characters in a story – any story – reacted how most people would it would be BORING AS FUCK.
The entire point of heroes, or protagonists, or whatever they are called, is that they don’t react like normal people would.
If they did they wouldn’t be heroes. And then we wouldn’t have a story.
If Romeo and Juliet had behaved like sensible adults then no one would ever have heard of them because they would have waited until they were grown up and then run away together. But that wouldn’t have made a good story.
If Luke Skywalker had any fucking sense he would have stayed home and not got involved. But then he wouldn’t have been a hero. Also he’d have been killed by The Empire. But that’s beside the point.
Anyway.
Which other Harry Potter film was he in?
He played Barty Crouch Jr, in “Goblet of Fire”, but which other film did he appear in?
Because I am having a hard time tracking down any evidence he appeared in any other.
I thought he stayed because his parents didn’t want to take him to Romania with them.
To be fair they left the rest of their sons behind as well, so it wasn’t just him :)
I entirely agree.
However it was a lot of fun, so thank you :)
Your argument about calling someone from your stove is entirely pointless, because you can’t use your hard-drive as a network card. But that doesn’t make it any less useful as a network card. You also can’t cook tea on your laptop (I am guessing) but that doesn’t make it any less useful as a laptop.
The laptop is still a collection of functioning devices that make up a larger whole. You can take one out and put it in another device, and both devices (both laptops) will still function just as well.
The internet is made up of lots of little functioning devices, all of which are interchangeable, but it can still be viewed as one large thing.
And hey – the wider the internet becomes, the harder it is to destroy Horcrux Number 3, so you don’t see me complaining.
See, I was just going to let this go, but you’ve annoyed me now so I am going to argue this until you give in.
Your laptop is made up of dozens of sub devices – a hard drive (solid state or scsi, I don’t know and I don’t care), a video card, a mother board, a network card, a keyboard with around 92 keys on it, a membrane to interface to all of those keys to the motherboard, a bios chip and a boatload of other things.
And yet you treat it as a single device because they all fit together to work together as one device.
Now – if I were to make your laptop my horcrux then, okay, that would be weird, because I would be giving you complete control over a part of my soul. But lets set that aside and focus on the real issue.
I would be planting my horcrux in the laptop which is made up of dozens of subdevices and yet most people consider a laptop to be a single device.
Same with a TV, or a mobile phone, or a computer monitor, or a mouse, or a living being.
We saw Slytherin’s Locket – that was clearly two bits of metal attached by a hinge. Three separate bits of metal attached together. On a chain. Which was made up of dozens of sublinks. How is that different from the internet, really?
The Diadem of Ravenclaw was even more ornate and complicated, from what I recall.
The internet, as a concept, is a single entity. Just because it has a lot of working parts, doesn’t mean you can’t view it as a single entity
That’s my argument and I am sticking to it.
The internet is the term for all of these objects. So I say it is a single object.
“The internet has revolutionised our lives”
If we can speak of it as a singular thing – and we do – then I argue I can treat it as such.
You don’t have to answer this, but just how many eggs have you had to go through to find these five?