gordon

Maybe, maybe not. Just depends TBH.

“flavor” lol

Which direction do you move your finger to access the next song on your phone when. Looking at a play list.

Your finger moves up then taps the one you want.

You could just as easily say that next should be up.

Both are wrong.

Next should be left, volume should be up / down.

Having grown up in the tape era, the right button being next / fast forward just make sense.

I can see on a screen that you’d scroll down to get to the bottom of a playlist, but isn’t your finger moving up?

This is the classic problem of inverted vertical controls or not?

Just avoid it altogether and make the back / skip button left / right respectively, and volume be up / down which just makes obvious sense.

The knob and buttons are separate controls. One controlled the frequency on the radio, one controlled the inputs.

The question was: which one do you think the knob controlled, frequency or inputs?

See, my favorite is GNU, for “GNU’s Not Unix”.

I’ve even heard people say “Double-yoos dot”, and even that compressed version is still more syllables than the full thing.

Sometimes our body tries to include traits of our ape ancestors.

But apes don’t have tails.

However approximately 25mya the monkey and ape lines split so itust have come from at least that far back.

I know a guy who’s initials are MRS, which is funny.

First left, then right.

2FA just took an unexpected turn.

Correlation. Does. Not. Equal. Causation.

Besides, everyone knows pot doesn’t make you gay, it was the fluoride, everyone knows that.

The star wars universe is intentionally “post-apocalyptic” “star-punk”. The star trek universe is post scarcity utopia. Hmmm. I wonder which one has better tech?

Hey man, just tried summit. So far it’s super quick but it’s almost too barebones for me. But I’m going to give it a try for a week and see if it grows on me.

I do love that you implement gestures

I’m not saying it’s right, just that’s their rationale. I literally discussed this with a middle school principal a few days ago and that was what she said.

Regardless of what you think about the policy, the fact is that your kids will have to abide by it.

Fact: if your kid is being bullied, they need to communicate to a person of authority. Answering a bully with violence is the wrong choice 99% of the time. They are usually bigger than you and have backup.

Also usually it doesn’t progress to a fight the very first time, usually it takes weeks, and during this time you would have many opportunities to tell a teacher or something.

Again, not advocating that this is right, but that’s their rationale.

Looking at it from the other side, it’s actually rare that an innocent kid is beat up without context.

Usually there’s 2 kids that have a beef and have been egging each other on for days. Eventually one kid says something and the other kid snaps and makes the first move but the second kid was just as guilty.

If you only look at “who started it” the second kid gets off scot free, while the first kid gets punished. Not really fair.

"Zero tolerance " attempts to fix this by recognizing that both kids likely played a part.

Nearly. I’m counting 19, but that’s close enough IMO.

Not cutting thru any peps