![](https://aussie.zone/pictrs/image/edb4380a-7530-41e7-98f5-d119e31aadca.jpeg)
![](https://feddit.uk/pictrs/image/402440a2-c9ee-4373-8c98-d55bda8ee4fa.png)
Also, would they have, anything to talk about? … ‘cricket noises’…
Also, would they have, anything to talk about? … ‘cricket noises’…
I actually came here to comment the same thing. For any philosophy question, be it a person, or an ideology ‘Philosophize This’ is one of my first stops every time. Stephen West (i thonk thats hos name) explains things so well, and respectfully no matter who he’s talking about.
And i’ve only caught one of his episodes on Anarchism, but it was packed full of really useful information for an initial basis for understanding.
So, a little while ago climate change deniers used the fact of fluctuations in temperature throughout the year as a basis for a false claim that climate scientists were hiding the ‘real’ data in the less jumbly plots you suggest the use of. (And any sensible person would see the benefits of).
Whoever produced this is likely aware of those cynical and false claims, and decided they don’t want any risk the point they are making, being similarly undermined.
I find it so crazy when i stumble across a post of yours in the wild! Hi!
I think he meant Electoral College. Unless 2016 saw the release of the ‘Tesla-Force 1’
Sounds more interesting than the hundredth uniform washing claim walking through the door.
Ancienne vin, oui, si vous plait!!
Maybe its supposed to be, “Out with the teapot in with the mug”?