I’ve always admired them for that, as one revolting people to another
On my redemption playthrough (send help)
I’ve always admired them for that, as one revolting people to another
We need to make it simpler and connect the dots. Like, what’s the worst that could happen when billionaires have exclusive control over a for-profit infinite gaslighting machine? This needs to be spelled out.
It’s true. In my country even a pitch perfect normal reaction to common current events would be rioting, so overreacting is usually out of the question.
My experience, again, is American. I am used to governments spending into debt and looking strong doing it.
All I’m saying is that it’s hard to understand, not that our way is better.
I’m having difficulty adjusting, as an American living in the UK. Twenty billion dollars is what an oligarch spends to destroy a social media platform. It is not, in my experience, a sum that spells years of ruin for a national budget.
All good here 👍💥
I wasn’t trying to downplay. If it can be wielded thoughtfully at scale, it could be life changing for literally millions.
The risk is that billionaires own these models, and far too often we see their interests aligned with fascism. If they choose to place a motive in this box, they now know it will have a quantifiable effect.
Let me guess, the good news is that conspiracism can be cured but the bad news is that LLMs are able to shape human beliefs. I’ll go read now and edit if I was pleasantly incorrect.
Edit: They didn’t test the model’s ability to inculcate new conspiracies, obviously that’d be a fun day at the office for the ethics review board. But I bet with a malign LLM it’s very possible.
It’s an issue. All I can say is that change has to come from within, and for me that means being more willing to “march with” lefties I don’t always agree with, as long as there’s something important we do agree about. If someone’s a bit tank-ish, I’ll gladly shake their hand when it comes to voting for proportional representation, for example.
Can I ‘yes, and’ that with the point that simply giving more money to poor people is now pretty well established to be good for both them and the economy
If care to argue that you’re normal, you’re not the good kind of weird.
Instead we have to worry about algorithmic traders flash crashing stocks. The tail is always going to try to wag this dog, but at least when humans are doing it other humans can react in real time.
Quark stars are weirder than you’d think it’s possible for anything to be.
He is a personified /pol/ shitpost.
The electorate has been far too tolerant of this behaviour. I don’t get why it’s been allowed to go on like this, other than the poor state of journalism these days.
Fine but I wanna playtest
I want a 2D Everett True beat-em-up in the style of River City Ransom where you go around thrashing decreasingly objectionable enemies, and eventually you go too far and it becomes a doomed boss rush where the whole town rises up to stop you
Edit: This might actually be my best game idea evar, OC donut steel
The Tories’ best chance of making a comeback was always to obstruct or lessen any future Labour wins. If their goal was to leave a mess and then force someone else to clean it up, it’s hard to see what they would have done differently.
Allow me to introduce myself
They are.