Please try to calm down a bit mate.
We can appreciate your frustration: It is not a fun situation when the main options for the government both support the horrible things happening in the Middle East.
I can promise you, we don’t enjoy it either. People choose to vote tactically to put the most pressure on the lesser of two evils, and avoid an even more questionable result (CON+REF+DUP coalition, anyone?)
Hopefully, one day we can see AV coming into practice. And we can see MPs better representing the votes of the nation.
And until then, we can continue to put pressure on bad situations, via the small parties, via protest. But not by cutting off our noses to spite our faces.
Please be civil with people on feddit.uk. Shouting is not civil.
What is it you’re expecting to find at the bottom of this hole you’re digging?
And a very important section, that does not surprise me at all:
The low success rate of applications has been put down, in part, to an increasingly number of speculative applications being submitted. Industry reports show a rise in so called “phantom projects” in these cases, developers submit multiple applications for many sites, with the expectation being that very few will connect. These speculative and duplicate applications have seen the connections queue grow, increasing the work needed to progress projects.
It becomes a sad self-fulfilling prophecy. Applications take a long time to process, so companies fling lots in parallel, then only use the first to get through.
Which means that applications take even longer to get through.
I’m not sure if there is a way to quickly find this. The best bet is probably trying the bigger instances, and seeing if it’s accessible through them.
You’ve made me think now: it might be a nice project for a some instance admins to flag when an instance they had received posts from goes offline. (I should probably check what I have from feddit.de!)
I’m just going to bump this: The deadline to register is 11:59 on Tuesday the 18th.
If you are not yet registered, you have less than 35 hours to do so.
I definitely did a double-take on that. “This guy is doing what my predecessor did”.
I guess he’s trying very hard to not be Corbyn?
I’m going to review it when I have a sec in terms of whether it’s a source that should be used here.
A cursory glance at their record on Wikipedia suggests the answer may be “no”.
Somebody stop her!
Isn’t there a risk that town would vote for him?
Your default sorting may handle it. I have mine set to Top Day, and because it was from over a week ago, it doesn’t show up.
Unfortunately, I’m not aware of another way to do it, other than blocking poor old frank, or waiting a month!
People throwing mysterious liquids over other people is a problem, even if it can be comical. Imagine if it had been one of those nutters throwing bathroom cleaner.
Apparently that’s a different person. More on this as it develops. Over to Emperor with sports news.
DM: “Are snowflakes making bioweapons against Nigel?”
“Wait, is that a milkshake?”
switches to max iso and 1/8000
Honestly, I’d put it in UK, as it’s general UK with politics underlining.
Right back at you my winged friend.
Last pound pint night I went to, I swear they were watering them down.
It was still a messy evening, mind.
2015, so not that long ag…oh shit…
“Waitrose customers found to be older and richer than average”
Whichever is on offer at the offy!
Plus a couple of bottles of that malt stuff from Nigeria.
I’ll let people in on a secret: I’ve quietly been working to that list for Unitedkingdom and UK Politics when I try to make decisions on whether a source is valid or not. That, and reminding people that DMG has other outlets, such as ThisIsMoney.
If people would like to codify it more formally, we can do that.