Hope you go broke. Chicken-shit yellow cowards.

Jar Jar ex machina is awesome.

Nah, that need dat water to cool the AI for the light.

He is guilty. And we’re polling on who thinks he’s guilty.

192.168.1.1/24. Got it.

- Everyone

That was number 13. Online casinos.

The cost is expected to be around £2.5bn per year.

Oh no no no. This is setting up to pay with lives.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said he believed bringing back compulsory service across the UK would help foster the “national spirit” that emerged during the pandemic.

Do you hear how that sounds? Or do you intend how that sounds?

Ooh ooh now do billionaires.

I know it’s not just millionaires, but they should feel the name shame.

“Relying on humans” is open to interpretation.

Space for eMacs.

Oh wow holy shit.

Edit: So anyway, at least battle hush-money has at minimum allowed shut-the-fuck-up-money to play.

If you have calories in your blood, you should leave them in there to get used instead of taking them out and back in. You wouldn’t be adding usable energy, you already had it.

You have energy stored in fat and muscle, but your body already is going to try and consume those without all that added stress of eating yourself from the outside.

Just spin the pipe wrench open and slide it up then you can switch it back real quick.

Thank you for watching this OHSA message on bad lockout procedure, now back to your regularly scheduled programming.

So DEI is ok if it’s protecting delicate conservatives in schools?

Oh wait no, I see. DEI is ok if you don’t like it but want legal backing to fuck with all levels of education.

“The intentional injection, release, or dispersion, by any means, of chemicals, chemical compounds, substances, or apparatus within the borders of this state into the atmosphere with the express purpose of affecting temperature, weather, or the intensity of the sunlight is prohibited,” the bill reads.

Gonna look dumb later when they need cloud seeding for a drop of rain.

Or when somebody applies the law to CO2 or methane and finds an express purpose.

Or if we come up with a remotely feasible sunlight solution for warming. But I think that’s their point isn’t it.

Every time I finalize my home office / game desk plans something comes along to motivate change.

Number of times “manufacturing” appears: One - in the (sub)head.

From Taylor Swift to Fortune 500 chief executives, private air travel has for years been portrayed to exemplify lavishness and excess, putting it on the radar of Democrats who want to rid the tax code of incentives that promote its use.

Companies have long benefited from laws that allow them to write off the cost of jets more quickly than commercial airlines can, and to pay less in fuel taxes. Included in the $5 trillion of tax increases proposed by the White House were plans to target corporate aviation and ramp up scrutiny of executives who use company planes for private trips.

President Biden raised the taxation of corporate jets at his State of the Union address this month and at a campaign event in Philadelphia last week as he laid out his ideas to make big companies “pay their fair share.”

Emphasis mine. And in THIS CORNER!

“We haven’t seen any real justification on why an important and essential American industry is being targeted for tax increases,” said Ed Bolen, president and chief executive of the National Business Aviation Association. “Proposals have been made, impressions may have been left and we would like to understand the facts behind it.”

Ryan DeMoor, head of aviation tax at MySky, said he didn’t expect the I.R.S. audits to bring in as much missing tax revenue as the agency anticipated. He said many executives were required to fly on corporate airplanes, even for personal travel, and argued that finance departments tended to be overly cautious about how they reported aviation taxes because of the risk and cost of getting them wrong.

“They’re falling into the fat-cat executive trope out there, which is just not the case,” said Mr. DeMoor, whose business helps companies manage their flight expenses. “Why would a Fortune 500 company put themselves at risk by trying to save a tiny bit of tax money on their flight department?”

I don’t pretend to know why “…many executives were required to fly on corporate airplanes, even for personal travel”, but if they think my first thought isn’t protecting their investment in the C-suite for insurance reasons or some shit then they are wrong. And to answer “Why would a Fortune 500 company put themselves at risk by trying to save a tiny bit of tax money on their flight department?” - well, if you think the struggling taxpayer watching his groceries go down in volume and up in price is going to answer that with anything but “to save even a tiny bit of fucking money to keep for yourselves” then that’s wrong too.