Would this not require us to only grow baby teeth?

Maybe if a person’s already had all their adult teeth removed, then you reactivate the gene instead of giving them dentures? Though, that means you might need all your teeth pulled if you lose some and want to regrow a new set. Perhaps you could get the gene applied in only a small area? Though, if a doctor fucks up they might start a new tooth regrowing right on a healthy tooth, and that might be bad. Also, what might this do to the regrower’s jaw bone, since adult teeth embed into the jaw bone?

Went ahead and looked up the original site and article in question: it’s not worth it. This person exclusively holds a stance of “O RLY??? (arms crossed, eyebrow raised)” to anything after the ultraviolet catastrophe’s resolution. They don’t have any solutions to the questions science has been trying to resolve. They just want to call the scientific community a bunch of quacks. They’re an anti-intellectual.

If anyone wants to read the article and make their own comments, feel free. I will not be linking it because it does not deserve platforming, just like all the other unsubstantive ideas that die in darkness.

EDIT: After also looking through the other articles, I do not in the slightest doubt that this article was AI slop. It reads like a bunch of summaries plucked out of Wikipedia. The other articles in question are: “AI Patent Assistance”, “Framework for LLM-Assisted Innovation and Strategy”, " Perceptron to Quantum AI", “Novel Approach to AI Benchmarking”, " Unmasking AI Bias", and “Untapped Potential of Mobile AI”. They also have a bunch more anti-intellectual drivel like " Physicists are Clueless", “Evolution Flaws and Solutions in Quantum Measurement”, and " Exposing the Flaws of Conventional Scientific Wisdom".

You’re stance is literally just anti-establishment with no original conjectures. You’re discourse is worthless for furthering physics. Rather than propel the field forward, your dialog exists only to attack current progress and cause hesitation.

If you actually came up with a single testable claim, even if immediately refuted by evidence, you still would have contributed more to scientific discourse than your rant did just now.

Science is about finding the best answers for the questions we get from our observations about the world. We do not throw out these answers, no matter how bizarre and unwanted they may be, if they fit the evidence we have. We only seek better ones as we go.

I love this idea of the asshole getting transferred to a new project, removed from said project shortly after, only to be put back on the project after another short period.

Haha! Take that, asshole!

Is post actually pinned? I tried finding it on Voyager after seeing “see pinned post for rules discussion” and I had to specifically search ‘rule’ in the search bar to find it - and it wasn’t even the first result.

Tried it on Firefox mobile as well, and it wasn’t pinned there either.