What’s wrong with making a recursive function in a recursive function with variables M, m, N, n? It’s perfectly fine when I’m writing infinite series.
What’s wrong with making a recursive function in a recursive function with variables M, m, N, n? It’s perfectly fine when I’m writing infinite series.
This is a decent truism.
Tnf, this is the kind of answer a person might give if you asked them the question randomly.
The voters decided to dump them on their collective ass, so in a way, they’re right.
Good job, voters!
The worst part is the title is probably wrong.
How the fuck?!
Why do you even want those things?
I’m a mathematician. 88 is a number. You think letting them have an entire number isn’t damaging?
I believe that’s correct, yes.
Degenerate, 88, 14, the Roman salute, multiple names, the fascista, shaven heads, lighting motifs, runic symbols.
That’s just what I came up with off the top of my head. The other person is right, and I say we should reclaim every symbol because those fuckers shouldn’t be allowed to call anything their own or have anything to ralley around or identify each other with. The only symbol I’m aware of that the made was the black sun which is itself simply the ss symbol repeated around a circle, which itself is an appropriated rune.
Reclaim every symbol.
I suggested something like this in high school.
“If gravity is the deformation of space, and dark matter is matter that we expect to exist because of gravity, is it possible that dark matter isn’t real and instead we’re just seeing space deformed [on a local scope] without any mass?”
I’ve since been disuaded from this position by observations of dark matter between the remnants of collided nebulae, suggesting that whatever makes up dark matter doesn’t flow past itself as easily as diffuse gas. Unfortunately, I don’t understand the implications of my own conjecture enough to say if this was an expected result, but it seems unlikely.
Thank you, I think I understand now. 🙂
I’m a mathematician with very limited programming experience. Can someone explain the significance of this?
On the morrow! Be ready, for at last we leave this shattered realm behind us.
Speaking as someone who has some experience with graphic design, I agree. She doesn’t seem to have any knowledge of accessibility features and her criticisms are mostly unrelated to how the eye follows information or how attention is drawn. They seem to be following a naive aesthetic doctrine instead of design principles.
It’s a good video (I’ve seen it; very informative and accessible cannot recommend enough), but I think you each mean different things when you use the word “intelligence”.
TIL I’m an alpha male. ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ
But she was practically frozen!
Because boomers use Facebook.
I don’t use either.
One step closer to having a full body prosthetic.
Polynomial subscripts sound awesome, ngl. Never seen it before; I want to know what the applications are.