Without consent, it would definitely be unethical.
Without consent, it would definitely be unethical.
It’s been a long while since I read it, but the one thing I remember is the idea that you should let people talk about themselves and they’ll like you for it.
I’m disappointed that no one responded to you with YTA or NTA.
A handheld time machine
The Loner’s Unaffiliated Disassociation.
Motto: “No members allowed.”
Concision seems like it should be a word for that which is made concise rather than the brevity itself. An incision is the cut made by incising.
Moral responsibility initially lies in the people responsible for creating the situation. The rioters are responsible regardless of which choice is made because they are the ones creating the circumstance in which there is no option to avoid injustice. If you’re the judge, you’re not responsible for the rioters killing more than one person, however unfortunate that is. You would be responsible for knowingly killing a known innocent.
Likewise, with the trolley problem, regardless of what choice the operator makes, whoever tied up the people and put them on the tracks and whoever caused the trolley to barrel out of control is at least initially responsible.
No, I read yesterday (Lightning McQueen) as juxtaposed with today (Thomas the Tank Engine), as if you were implying that Lightning McQueen predated Thomas the Tank Engine and TTTE was a newish show.
I’m not sure I understand the “yesterday’s” part. Thomas the Tank Engine predates Cars by decades.
“Somehow Palpatine returned”
"An apostrophe followed by “s” was often used to mark a plural;[4] specifically, the Oxford Companion to the English Language notes that
There was formerly a respectable tradition (17th to 19th centuries) of using the apostrophe for noun plurals, especially in loanwords ending in a vowel (as in … Comma’s are used, Philip Luckcombe, 1771) and in the consonants s, z, ch, sh, (as in waltz’s and cotillions, Washington Irving, 1804)…"
You have it backwards. It actually used to be the standard.
“Until the 18th century, the apostrophe was extensively used to indicate plural forms. Its use for indicating plural “possessive” forms was not standard before the middle of the 19th century.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostrophe
But in language, generally, usage can alter standards, so you may see a shift of grammarians saying it’s acceptable if enough people see it as valid.
Okay. Thanks. I’m already subscribed there. It’s sadly not as active as I’d like.
I’m not finding a cyberpunk community at dbzer0.
I’m subscribed to the goblincore community on blahaj.zone, but it’s only got two posts that I can see.
Crows, typography, goblincore, cyberpunk
A lot of libraries have online chat services where you can ask a reference librarian for help researching a topic. They can point out good sources and alternative search databases that might be more relevant than a general Google search depending on your query topic.
Depends on the stores these days, in my experience. Some stores are scheduling fewer cashiers after installing more self checkout lanes and have removed signage about item limits in self checkout. If you want a human cashier, you have to wait a while because there might only be one on shift so you get a line.
Makers by Cory Doctorow
You were excited to get email because it was almost always from a human being who put meaning and intent into their message. It was like getting a handwritten letter compared to all the random terms of service update emails from a service you haven’t used in four years and emails from a service you didn’t sign up for because someone else thinks your email address is their email address and the outright spam in the filter.
Taking someone’s lead sounds like a British saying indicating the opposite of following someone’s lead. It sounds like you’re taking someone’s leash in your hands and directing them where to go.