• 0 Posts
  • 100 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle







  • But when was the last time they landed on the Moon?

    1972, which was the last time NASA even bothered attempting to land on the moon at all(well, soft land. They’ve sent up an impactor since then). It’s not like they kept trying and suddenly started failing, they just never planned another landing mission until Artemis 2 and 3.

    Tell me though, what did Apollo 17 have that every moon mission since has not had? Oh yeah, people, and not even for the first time ever, no. That was the 6th time in a roughly 3 year timeframe that NASA put people on the moon. Oh yeah, and on all 6 of those occasions, and even the disastrous Apollo 13, all the astronauts made it home safe.

    So the last time NASA even tried to land on the moon, they 100% successfully did so, while doing something for the 6th time that no other space agency to this day has done before or since.

    Let me know when JAXA puts people on the moon, and then we can talk about them being more capable than NASA.

    NASA tells us they’ll have Artemis ready by, what, next year?

    Yawn, I’m so tired of this argument. Literally all you guys ever say nowadays when trying to denigrate NASA is “You really think Artemis will launch on time? lol”. I’ve been hearing the same low effort argument since well before Artemis 1 launched. How about expounding on it for once and actually explain why you think Artemis will fail, as you clearly think it will? Not be delayed, fail. Everyone paying attention(clearly you weren’t, or you would have already known and not needed to edit your post) knew for over a year prior to the official delay announcement that A2 and A3 would be delayed, that does not mean anything as far as the success of the actual mission goes.

    Sure, congress could slash their budget, as they’re often prone to doing, which could possibly kill the program, but that still says nothing about NASA’s technical capabilities.


  • Lemmy is VERY left leaning overall, and also still very small. You’re just not going to find enough people here to populate an entire instance based around the terf’s book series. Moreover, why would you even need an entire instance dedicated around one fandom? I’m still confused as fuck that Star trek has multiple dedicated instances.

    Additionally, putting the terf aspect aside, the Harry Potter fandom just isn’t what it used to be. Cursed child was garbage, Fantastic Beasts were garbage… and that’s all there’s been in recent memory besides “Wizards used to shit themselves”. The last HP movie was 12 years ago, the last actual book 16-17ish years ago. The fandom is moving on.

    That all being said, this IS Lemmy. Absolutely nothing is stopping you from starting a Harry Potter instance.




  • What a stupid metric to base competency off of. NASA has successfully landed on Mars 6 times in the last 20 years; the most recent of which included a drone, achieving the first ever controlled powered flight on another planet(and it’s still going, over 60+ flights more than the “optimistic” 5 that were planned).

    Landing on Mars is exponentially harder than landing on the Moon, and only NASA and CNSA(China) have fully succeeded at it(The USSR’s Mars 3 only gets partial credit imo), and only NASA has done it more than once(9 times total, to be specific)






  • DVDs were also commonly used as external data storage prior to flash storage becoming the predominant method. Anyone still have their spindle of dvds with a Win XP backup lying around?

    Blu-ray doesn’t have that advantage. The only major commercial applications it has been used for is movies and games, and games are already breeching the size that even a 4k blu-ray can hold, and have long since required faster data transfer speeds than blu-ray is capable of(this is why even with physical games, the game has to be installed to the console)