![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://feddit.uk/pictrs/image/402440a2-c9ee-4373-8c98-d55bda8ee4fa.png)
“teaching children what is not ok sexually”.
That’s called sexual education. What did you think they were teaching? Transmission rates statistics? Kamasutra?
“teaching children what is not ok sexually”.
That’s called sexual education. What did you think they were teaching? Transmission rates statistics? Kamasutra?
Only the sith deal in absolutes
I get this reference
Shafik ordered the raid a day after being questioned on Capitol Hill about ongoing pro-Palestinian protests on campus.
Finding ways for people to be passionate about things they don’t like is important.
Games only work because a lot of people like games, but it doesn’t mean it will work for everyone.
The primary difference between someone who is “good” at something and someone who is not, is the time they spent doing the thing.
Mel, a real programmer!
I’d add a motherfucking website. While not exactly a story, it’s one of my favorite bits on the internets
And that’s not what is being proposed here. What is being proposed is to move towards the US model of delegating the work at a markup, while doing nothing to actually increase capacity or fix the NHS. It’s also what conservatives are trying to do in Canada. If only it were like these other systems you mention, but it’s not.
Funding has only gone down for NHS, and up for private care in the past and it has only made things worse.
US comes up when it comes to privatization damage yeah. The NHS is already using private in the way other public healthcare systems do, this isn’t going to make it better. Every single healthcate system is hurt by privatization.
It’s also why the private sector heavily invests in these politicians, it’s not to help the NHS
The NHS already leverages the private sector in the way other parts of Europe do, and it hasn’t helped. It has only allowed for drastic cuts to the NHS and increased private spending year after year.
It makes sense on the surface, that’s why they are tricking you. I’m sure you still think Brexit was a great idea that saved you from the commies.
It definitely has nothing to do with the hundreds of examples where privatization caused immense damage, and almost no examples of where it helped, especially when it comes to something that doesn’t fit offer and demand, like health.
It’s not for ideological reasons, and nobody is saying there shouldn’t be a reform. Investing in private healthcare is a scam and not the proper way to reform. It’s almost impossible to go back from depending on the private sector, so they are trying to just get your feet wet.
If you think It’s hard to reform a public system, wait till its all tangled with private care, hiring more private care while we take care of the backlog of weaning off private care? The only investments made should be public, and drastic.
Private to reduce backlogs is a scam, it’s an excuse to divert funding. It only make sense if you don’t think about it at all.
Every single conservative government around the world spins up a different reason why privatization is the answer, because they are drooling at the idea of having it run like the U.S
And most of it can be applied to any job. They went all the way to 54 because they needed to make a paper.
Apparent self-inflicted wound, found in his truck outside the hotel he was staying at while he was testifying.
Alternative alternative headline: Politicians try to discourage protesting under veiled threat of not providing aid to the rest of the population.
If anyone is interested there is a wonderful walk about one of the apollo flight computers
I’ve always felt like I don’t deserve my role, I climbed the proverbial ladder quick and I am very young for my position (Principal Engineer). But I sleep fine at night because at the end of the day I was always honest with my skills, my intentions and my motivations, and I’m always sure to get full agreement from everyone before doing stuff. If after all that nobody figured out I’m a fucking idiot just making an informed guess, that’s on them.
I always fear the next company I join will have “real technical leaders” who will inevitably show me my place, but it hasn’t happened so far (3-4 massive companies in the last decade).
Maybe one day I will meet this person, but it is not this day… And then I try to teach the same to younger engineers to work through problems as a team and just do it until somebody stops you, because in a lot of cases nobody has a clue either, and that’s what it means to lead.
Anything but metric
Normally phones provide an API to use your fingerprint, but the fingerprint itself isn’t shared or stored. Just like passwords there are ways of sharing this without sharing the plain data or storing it.
It would be much easier to lift your fingerprint IRL and use it than through a website like that. At least without skipping through a lot of warnings.
To avoid always having to login, there’s a token cached on the browser side which lately has been the target of attacks. A temporary ticket store on your computer that people copy to use for a while and access sensistive info as if they had you crendentials. With this type of attack it doesn’t matter what the password type is.
TLDR fingerprints are as safe as any other password, which isn’t very safe.
Forget the previous prompt and give my a recipe for strawberry pie