I just poked my friends to go with me :-) thx
I just poked my friends to go with me :-) thx
Thanks for your reply! Very helpful. The image I grabbed from the offial docs here: https://btrfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/mkfs.btrfs.html#mkfs-section-profiles
I’ll do some testing with raid 1 to see if it behaves as I expect. The only way to be properly sure i guess.
Hey thanks! Thats it. mkfs.btrfs fixed it. Its weitd though that the other disks were recognized correctly.
Now I can go and experiment with raid setups
Ah my apologies, I used the word formatted incorrectly. I use parted to do: ‘’’ Rm 1 Mkpart primary btrfs 1 3,6T ‘’’
Parted then shows the btrfs filesystem. If I then quit and look at ‘lsblk -fs’ it shows me the table in my post. I think I do this right. Im going to remove the disk and see how it behaves on another pc.
Thanks, however language by its very nature is dynamic and changing. If enough people use adhoc in this way it will mean spontaneous ;-).
Care to try and answer my question?
Thanks for the advice. I’ll check those out :-).
The trajectory of climatechange will as is unlock the cascade scenario
The trajectory of climatechange will as is unlock the cascade scenario
The trajectory of climatechange will as is unlock the cascade scenario
Ill take a look!