deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Looks like it is self-correcting and resolves within 24 hours.
Nutomic gave insight here (https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/1986#issuecomment-1671036006)
It seems to be self correcting thank you!
edit: wanted to edit and give more context for future searches. Nutomic gave insight here (https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/1986#issuecomment-1671036006)
Lemmy refetches users and their public keys every 24 hours, so after that time the federation will work fine.
but the pointer-pointer isn’t pointing at the pointer…
Found in Table B-30 in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
- Race
- Color
- Religion
- Retaliation (a.k.a. reprisal)
- Sex/Gender (gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, pregnancy)
- National origin (not nationality)
- Equal pay and compensation
- Age (over 40)
- Disability (physical or mental)
- Genetic Information
Yeah we have guidance to not discriminate and hire based on national origin. It’s better to look at the whole group of people we’ve hired and realize that there are a small number of people that do this. Still, I have conflicted feelings, and I’m trying my best to beat my biases. This is really the cost of moral actions, and it’s worth it.
I love this thread! It shall be saved.
went from like +300 fake points to -600. hurt worse than it should :’)
edit: it’s still ongoing, every post now starts with a net -7 vote, i think i’ll start adding a disclaimer on all my new comments lol
? Who? China?
edit: yooo, i just got bot downvoted by 16 on almost all my posts/comments, China mad.
i vs L strikes again
what? all i see is an X? i must be too pure hearted compared to all you deviants.
If I were you, I’d just write them off as absolutely crazy and move on. Not worth your mental energy anymore.
edit: to answer the question, gotta find a way to quantify your pain in monetary impact, but I don’t think it would go far.
“have you tried turning it off and back on again?”
i.e. i’ve seen it correct itself by unsubscribing and subscribing again
gotcha ok i think i’m getting it. just to make sure i’m not missing anything, you’re saying that in this case it didn’t matter as in the end they could use any TLD and achieve the same effect.
but in general, threat actors hope to confuse people into thinking this “.zip” TLDs are only referencing local files instead of web addresses. right?
i think i understand that part but why is this specific event “another reason to block this TLD”? can’t they just use any TLD for this and achieve the same thing? is there another inherit security issue with .zip that doesn’t exist with other domains?
I’m kinda confused, isn’t that what they did? Although you are probably saying you’d be less pissed if the prices for all the individual items were increased 18% so you knew the actual prices at the start?