I heard them described as bullshiting machines. The have no concept of, or regard for truth or lies, and just spout whatever sounds good. Much of the time it’s true. Too often it’s not. Sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference.
I heard them described as bullshiting machines. The have no concept of, or regard for truth or lies, and just spout whatever sounds good. Much of the time it’s true. Too often it’s not. Sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference.
Interesting. The corrected data still leans in that direction.
Anecdotally, a friend of mine worked a few years helping people after traumatic brain injuries. She noticed the women always had a husband to help with their care, but all the men were devorced and alone.
The study, published this month in the journal Physics Review E, suggests that a fatty material called myelin that surrounding the nerve cell’s axon—the fiber that transmits electrical impulses to other nerves or body tissues—provides an environment in which the entanglement of photons is possible.
Still need show it definitely happens, it’s definitely part of the brains processing, and it’s definitely where consciousness comes from.
This article is like 90% speculation.
The comma separates the figures, from the costumes.
You had my curiosity.
Now you have my attention.
It would fall under rule 3 I’d think.
“Never spend more for an acquisition than you have to.”
The filters and music are certainly doable.
I’m not sure the endless scrolling is something that should be emulated.
Identity isn’t real.
It’s a useful fiction that helps us get by in the world by creating a delusion of understanding.
It’s only mostly broken. And mostly broken means slightly working!
Lemmy has it (or did) already. Some instances use it, many don’t.
Which theory exactly are we rejecting dogmatic approaches to?
As I said, I agree with the literal facts. The implications in your phrasing I disagree with.
Instead of unfounded, I would call it unproven.
Instead of scaremongering I would say warning.
And generally I avoid using absolute terms like “all”, since only it takes one counter example, to make such a statement factually wrong.
Yes! That is most literally true!
People doubt the face value benign intension of Meta with regard to the Fediverse.
Which leaves uncertainty of their real intention.
Naturally causing fear of a self interested malicious intention.
Which all seem to be quite reasonable concerns, given Meta’s market position and history.
I’m pretty sure all user data is public already.
PMs might be the only thing not everyone can see.
I wouldn’t put a timeline to it. Just a list of features, broad and specific. As time goes on, they can be marked as “in progress” or “included”. New things can be added over time, or made more specific. All without timetables. For now call it a wishlist.
I’ve never worked or even been to a power plant. What’s that mean? It sounds like a mess.
deleted by creator
Nothing involving the thoughts and ideas of millions of people is simple.
Hell. Very little involving the thoughts and ideas of a individual person is simple.
By doing it slower. The sound comes from breathing quickly not deeply.
Yes that’s correct.
All has posts from all the communities the members on that instance subscribe to.