• 0 Posts
  • 135 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 3rd, 2023

help-circle




  • Stovetop@lemmy.worldtoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlAmazon Advice
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I found myself using Amazon less and less for shipping, so when Prime Video started injecting ads, I canceled and haven’t looked back.

    My solution is that I buy my products in stores, now. I hate it, but that’s what it’s come to. The Amazon deals are not what they once were, so there’s barely a difference in cost. Plus, with so much garbage just flooding Amazon’s search results, it admittedly helps to be able to see a product before choosing to buy it.








  • Right, it’s just that there is no component inherent to anarchy which prevents a leader from rising anyways. Someone who is charismatic and skilled at what they do will naturally attract followers, and suddenly factionalism takes hold.

    Anarchy can be deliberate, but if it is being proposed as a long-term format for society, it would need some form of protection in place to prevent the entire thing from falling apart the moment a faction of enough mass decides they know what is best for everyone. That’s usually the role a government fulfils, but anarchy doesn’t have that.


  • It’s more the idea that it can be changed that I think the previous commenter was referring to. Since anarchy is not a codified structure, it is susceptible to a plurality forming around influential figures who become de facto leaders, and suddenly the system of anarchy falls apart.

    If the plurality remains influential, you’ve got a dictatorship/monarchy. The majority could work together to block the dictatorship from forming, but that would require organization and compromise to bring people with disparate priorities together, effectively creating an early stage democracy.

    In such a scenario, should either side prevail, they will also want some structure that either preserves their power (in the case of dictatorship) or places checks on power (in the case of democracy) and suddenly you have a government again.



  • And yet US news is the only category which is singled out in this community, so the US gets to be the defining factor in terms of what this community is about.

    I get why that is, because for some reason US news tends to dominate the conversation wherever it is, hence why the “news” community on Lemmy.world is mostly filled by US news. Despite that community having no stipulation on country of origin, despite this not being an American-hosted site, and despite Americans not even being the majority of users here.

    I just think it’s just regrettable that the idea of “world news” is defined chiefly by whether or not it takes place in America, and not by a measure of global significance. For example, the post right next to this one in this community is about a bar shooting in Ireland, yet the “not world news” crowd is completely absent in the comments.


  • It doesn’t seem to be how it works in practice, though, since the largest news communities by far on Lemmy.world are worldnews (34k subscribers) for any non-US news and news (18k subscribers) for any news, US or otherwise.

    The next highest news community dedicated to a specific country on Lemmy.world that isn’t the US is canada_news at 151 subscribers. There are several other larger news/worldnews/US news communities hosted on or federated with Lemmy.world in between.

    The separation into specific country communities for a given topic is a bit of an odd categorization to make as well, given that we don’t really have separate communities for, like, Norway Dogs or Panama Gaming or China Technology or Brazil Music. And if there were, one would assume it would be targeted to locals of those countries and feature content in the native language, rather than appeal to an international audience.


  • TIL the US isn’t in the world.

    I do get the core of what you mean, but at the same time isn’t it a bit silly that we set the categories of news between “the US” and “literally everyone else”?

    Personally, I don’t think the US deserves to have its own privileged classification of news that keeps it separate from the rest of the world. Otherwise we’re just letting the US be the center that “world news” revolves around.




  • There is still a bit of a gray area there, though, which is that if you know you are not a subject matter expert, you should try to disclose that.

    Hence why “IANAL” is so recurring on any online discussion about legal advice, because you want to offer what insight you can but you definitely don’t want to mislead anyone into believing your potentially dangerous legal advice is authoritative.