I’m no George Bush fan, but in his defence:

Point 1: the implication is the US are thinking about how the enemy will harm them

Point 2: he is convinced the purpose of war is to establish peace

Point 3: he probably meant "to catapult over the propaganda

Point 4: ya dun fukt up

Point 5: ya dun fukt up 2 George Bush Junioroo

Point 6: (yes, i know it’s hypocritical) he’s right tho lol

Point 7: heh heh

It’s my fourth time today, it’s gonna be a bit…

I’m more worried about Google’s income. How can they afford to spy on me if they aren’t being paid far out the ass to host what will soon be security theatre.

I always pictured the archetypical Karen as having brown hair with blonde highlights.

I’ve unironically had this happen to me, same friend, twice.

They had the audacity to blame me, despite being generous enough to perform some basic maintenance and performance enhancements.

Then when they got home, forgot to plug it back in.

Can’t wait for Weird Al to host the debate, just like last time.

No, I think you were right the first time, when you said you don’t know what I mean.

You sound like a cunt, and I mean that in the nicest possible way.

Don’t talk to people so condescendingly, if you don’t know what I mean, then ask me to clarify, instead of creating a strawman.

Kinda surprising given the knowledge we have that teens even want to use it.

I hope the next generation of teenagers think social media is cringe boomer shit (because now, it basically is).

Same energy as Joan Cornella’s comics

There are a lot of issues which people know nothing about, sure, but it would be nice to let people ignore issues they aren’t familiar enough.

Though, if you were to present the question, it would be pertinent to let both sides weigh in. It would be good if people were presented both sides of the argument before voting on an issue and required a basic test to confirm they understand each sides point.

Though my example for solitary confinement would be maybe too broad, perhaps there are possibilities for voting with gradations? Similar to how we can vote for someone who is somewhere in the middle of an issue.

I’m an advocate for ending solitary confinement - completely, for any crime. The statistics show that it doesn’t deter violence, and breaks minds in a way where recovery is impossible for some.

Although politicians make laws on things about which they know nothing, so there’s that…

I really wish there was a better way. I’ve thought about the idea of discarding representatives entirely.

Imagine if people didn’t need to vote for people who were going to make choices for us, and we got to choose the outcomes of each point of tension.

Example: if 60% of the population voted to end solitary confinement, then it gets passed immediately.

This wouldn’t need to be done at a particular time either - we could submit our opinions via a government website, and update them at our convenience.

Of course people will say that voting via internet isn’t secure, and it could be hacked, but I think utilising a block chain might actually prove useful for the first time ever.

I’m sure there are flaws with this idea, but there are flaws with the way things are now.

It’s tough.

Mandatory voting encourages young people to vote, who are far more likely to vote progressively, so it works in favour of my preference.

However, I don’t think it’s right to force people to have an opinion about something, of which they know nothing about.

"You know who else liked to clean up? Hitler; the physical manifestation of the archetypical monster inside all of us, bucko.

Niche once said, am I’m paraphrasing here: when you stare into the monster, you’ll find the monster staring back at you.

And that’s no joke, you could very well say that the monster is the metaphysical lobster who pops bendodiazapine’s like a three year old with a sugar addiction.

And you know what happens then? You become the embodiment of Peter Pan, the boy who never grows up, and that’s you Elmo, you’re at least fifty years old, and you refuse to clean up your bedroom."

Knov’s nen ability was such a cool idea. Using it as a killing floor for Netero to pick off the chimera one by one was brutal.

I’m surprised they didn’t plan to use it to trap Meruem somehow. Netero could have slapped Meruem into one of the portals.

Fun fact: every letter except V can be pronounced silently.

Birds eye view of that time me and my friend brought our Beyblades to school.

You can see this on Anthony Magnabosco’s YT channel, he uses the Socratic Method to challenge peoples ideas, and often has people rethink their own beliefs, it’s truly something everyone should learn to imitate.

That’s why I’m a fruitarian. I only eat fruit once it drops from the tree.

Why is South Korea trying to stop Putin from hurting his own army?