You maybe right, but I just can’t see any big risk for Israel here besides lose their institutions to an autocratic leader.

Netanyahu is not like Churchill against the nazis, Hammas is like a bunch of Kids with sticks against Israel Army

I don’t get what part of

I don’t like Hammas

spread terror until today

You read as

Hamas are the good guys

You are fighting a strawman my friend.

I was just responding the point that still exists hostages in Gaza, I don’t expect that Hammas cares about hostages but I expect that Israel care about their citizens, because the first is a militia, and other is a state with one of the best army in the world.
Independently of what I believe or not, when Israel says “we don’t negotiate with terrorists”, it is just a political decision, maybe even this negotiation would not work, but is not something that Israel strategists are venting.

I don’t like Hammas, specially because they were funded by Israel to attack Fattah and other members of the PLO in the 80’ and spread terror until today.

But right now Hammas is trying to negotiate to release their hostages, but for Israel is more important to bomb Gaza (supposedly Hammas, cause of course there is no secular civilians in Gaza) than the safety of their own citizens.

Its not like Israel could still attack Hammas after the deal, you know?

Not only vetoed but said they were disapointed of Brazilian proposition. They just want blood as always, blood of the poors.

Too much thought process dude, stop thinking.

Yeah, BBC is also completely biased.
And calling Al Jazeera biased?
Dafuq are you talking? You come here, spit a lot of shit baseless and call it a day, average internet user.

USA is directly involved on the conflict with more than 5000 soldiers ready, believe in this is like believing in Belarus statements about Ukraine war.

BBC does not found any evidence of the attack from any side but al Jazeera had a live stream that shows a rocket comming from Israel at the same time.

This argument that the blast site does not appears to be from a Israel’s warhead is shit. Israel would not target a Hospital directly and this could be a piece of the rocket that broke off.

https://slrpnk.net/post/3200423

Removed by mod

Wtf dude, you just don’t know what you are talking about. Implying that “if they want live their traditions they should not use medicine”, also

Take a look at every single culture on the planet that isn’t an uncontacted tribe. They literally all want to live like “westerns” as you put it, and frankly who wouldn’t.

A lot of indigenous ppl around the world want to live in this way, you have tons of documentaries showing that. If tried to learn about the topic or talk with native ppl you would know that.

you are just a racist colonizer implying your values to others.

People are welcome to live without permanent shelter, running water or modern medicine but I doubt they’ll take that option.

And so? What is your point here?

No, it’s not, native ppl don’t live the same way as westerns, not acknowledging this is forcing them to live the way of colonizers. When you talk about sociological equality you are not talking about treating everyone the same, but respecting the differences, and this referendum is just forcing the colonizer way of living over the colonized without any dialogue, because creating the body would not mean actually a change, but even this is denied.

they are as recognised as any other Australian citizen

It’s not what it seems, when you have a 17.5x more chance to the incarcerated only because where you were born, independently of why, it’s clear that you is not like any other and there is a big gap between groups of power.

The proposal, to recognize Indigenous people in the constitution and create an Indigenous body to advise government on policies that affect them, needed a majority nationally and in four of six states to pass.

Jeez

I’m not trying to do that, I’m trying to understand how to international interests interact with the war, if you really want to understand international conflicts you should do this all the time.

Saying “Hammas bad” is much more juvenile, and is equivalent of saying “fart” for the discussion

That just is not the point. I mean, if you are involved in the conflict you can totally believe in anything, but the point is in the moment you call them terrorist and call it a day you lost any possibility to analyze the situation and understand WTF is happening and why.

BBC is not saying they are NOT terrorists, but it does not matter in this context.

But complaining about whataboutism while you ignore the problem everytime somoeone powerfull or ally does sucks the same. A war of suckers.

Not saying they are right or wrong, but when you are born in a country you are directly affected by his history, and they are affected by something your grandparents were (?) responsible for. Look at more extreme examples, imagine a person born in the Belgian Congo, knowing all atrocities Belgium did to keep the country a shit, how you would expect this person to look at Belgium as a partner? To nurtur any kind of admiration towards the ppl?

Besides not agreeing I can totally understand the feeling,

Germany was split but received tons is Marshal’s money even being the aggressor, while Poland was stuck in URSS after being traded by Hitler and Stalin and then abandoned by thr allies in the Yalta conference even being the first victim.

How much is enough to repair this kind of damage? How much of their modern failures are actually stupid decisions and how much is historical inheritance?

Just normal, the only thing that Russia could provide is the protection of the ppl Armenian ppl on Azerbaijan. After that, joining international criminal court can help put some eyes of westerns on the situation, since western countries usually don’t care about genocide perpetrated by allies, and Azerbaijan is very close to Otan.

Imagine believing in sanctions in 2023, lmao.

Not the OP here, and I do not disagree with you in general, but I feel that Kazakhstan seems a cool place, the other Turkish countries seem “visitable” as well. The big problem is all these countries with sharia law or with a big influence of sharia defenders, and it is not only Middle East but a lot of saarian countries too.