Problem in this case is the specification is vague on what the ‘correct’ thing to display is.
Problem in this case is the specification is vague on what the ‘correct’ thing to display is.
I think you messed up the link formatting :)
?
Of the numerous articles I’ve posted thus far, exactly ONE series (about the Supreme Court scandal) could reasonably be said to directly concern US politics.
Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.
Have you ever dealt with 8 year olds? They would have asked all the poop related questions anyway
Getting to space. Fuck Musk, but SpaceX is doing great work.
But we know that’s not how transporters work
Do we? Transporters are magic. They’ve never been logically consistent. Half the episodes either would have resolved in 5 minutes or never happened if they were.
this stuff may be just handwavy bulls#!t at
Fully agreed. Just like transporters :P
My headcanon is that they have feedstocks and are just teleporting atoms around and gluing them together, maybe adding and electron here and there. If anything it’s the most consistent use of their transporters.
It is explicitly chosen by Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists (TERFs) as well as by right-wing transphobes
It can also be used by people with no agenda, including most of the non-western world. Language policing is ridiculous. You want to cancel the transphobes? Stop giving them power and reclaim their terms from them.
Agreed with the other commenter, there’s no real reason to think the author’s transphobic due to a random phrase. We as a society really need to stop organising witch hunts.
Whoops, bits vs bytes. This is why I should stop commenting before I’ve had coffee
2 bytes would give you 0-4 per segment. Or about IPv2
Can we trade relatives?
Would any of your tech-handicapped relatives actually pay it any attention, though?
You’re missing the point of the comment you’re replying to, which is that the devs don’t understand decompilers RIGHT NOW, and it’s formatted in a tongue in cheek way similar to their current comment about VCS