Although I understand your point, it’s a stupid fucking piece of shit excuse.

Although I can agree with you on the legal challenge, The Economist are journalists. Journalists are supposed to investigate.

Instead, they take Israeli stance at the face value and claim it’s not genocide.

NK space force achieved Google Map screenshot.

That’s an insult to gigantic global sewers.

I don’t think I’ll convince you, but…

what you quoted only makes the Hamas facility the target. Civilians inside that hospital are not valid targets.

I agree Hamas is to blame. But that doesn’t mean we’ll watch Israel bombard civilians and support Israel for that.

Bye.

That’s even worse

Even if Hamas has a command center underneath the hospital, it doesn’t justify killing civilians inside the hospital.

Edit: clarification of my point

Where’s Genova when we need it? Well, we always need it.

Would be kind of interesting if they sue in a red State. Or it goes to the Trump Supreme Court. And why not sue them in Genova?

Nepal is the future

If I can choose a single language that’d be lisp. Very beautiful to write.

And US politicians call anti-Israel protesters antisemitic. Fucking hell.

Never make a loan with the Chinese government. They intentionally bankrupt you to “borrow” your asset (in many cases, important sea ports) for 99 years. They update that contract every year to lend it fir the next 99 years. You effectively gave away your asset to China forever.

That’s also what the occupiers of China did to China itself before the end of WW2 – seize Chinese ports indefinitely.

There’s no point raising a metaphor in the first place. A metaphor doesn’t justify anything. It’s just a rhetorical tool that is supposed to help deliver a point. However, all it does in this instance is mess and draw confusion.

Nah, news organizations aren’t internet echo chamber.

I mean, if they write dozens of opinions a day, news organizations labeled center-left or even left-leaning have to go to the other side sometimes. If not, they’re just propaganda machines.

Maybe we’ll even call it a western variant of North Korea in the end. All autocrats head to NK apparently.

Yes I agree it’s misleading (and I’m OP). The first paragraph especially.

At this point I suspect it’s a new scam. These people are clearly deliberately not paying their lawyers. Once the lawyers are done, they move on to new ones.

I’m wondering whether the lawyers are complicit – I guess not. But I honestly have no idea whether Trump & co. are generating profits through this scheme.

Edit: so, one way to establish a scam in this way is for the lawyers to demonstrate how they’d defend other conservatives. By defending people around Trump, these lawyers, for example, might be introduced to potential conservative clients. When they find enough clients they call it a day, and cancel the contract with the powerful people who don’t pay them.

God damn, I refreshed my donation to UNICEF and am hoping other people follow suit.

Propaganda is running well when Israel can casually do holocaust…