• 0 Posts
  • 47 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 24th, 2022

help-circle



  • I aim for a (un)healthy mixture of tech and political commentary, far more than I could ever actually listen to.

    Based on your current selections, you seem to favor comedy/celebrities/comedians. I don’t follow too much stuff like that, but I have maybe two suggestions: Blocked and Reported for Internet bullshit (furry infighting, Adult Baby Diaper Lovers, Twitter drama). It tends towards a sort of moderate liberal/radical centrist politics. Srsly Wrong do kind-hearted goofy skits to explain their politics. Self-identified utopian socialists.

    Most of the rest of the stuff I listen to is some variant of interviews with important thinkers or 2+ dudes/chicks/yos shooting the shit about socialism or FLOSS.



  • The YouTube channel Then and Now is pretty good for beginners.

    CCK Philosophy is good for Nietzsche, Marx, and postmodern / continental philosophy broadly, but you’ll get more out of his work after reading a bit of those first.

    Ben Burgis is a Marxist who teaches logic. He’s not always a great public speaker, but he’s very affable and generally on point. Will interview interesting people too.




  • The other thing that makes it tough is that we don’t really have a good grasp of what it is. At least, last i checked.

    Like, are we just pathologizing people on this or the other side of a fuzzy threshold of executive function? Or is there a population that really is physiologically/genetically different? Either way, is there something wrong with society where people within a previously normal range of executive function are now unable to keep up?












  • This is kind of like what happens internally on platforms for 3rd party sellers like eBay, Amazon, and AliExpress. Even decades later they’re still working the kinks out obviously. Amazon and AliExpress particularly have lots of scammers, so they clearly haven’t figured out the secret sauce yet. They’re not under-resourced, so either they’re under-motivated to weed it out or it’s actually pretty tricky to do.

    My guess is it’s both, but more that it’s just tricky to implement a reliable system of reputation and trust. EBay and Amazon got around it early on by being cheap and establishing policies that heavily favored buyers in disputes, which made the prospect of using the service less risky to the public, improving their market shares. They probably also have non-trasparent systems for tracking buyer reputations as well to avoid abuse.

    It seems to be the norm to keep these systems obscure to avoid abuse, but to make a truly functional open platform you would need to have public systems, so I’d hope that the norm of obfuscation is out of convenience or laziness and isn’t required to make the system function.