Influencers should be called manipulators.

I thought it was meant to be the new twitter, by design… wut?

So why are you highlighting their activities and, absurdly, calling it an attack on democracy? You are giving their ‘shock tactics’ publicity (whilst denouncing those tactics as ineffective), claiming to agree with their message, and at the same time accusing them of an entirely different agenda: ‘anti-democratic’. You make no sense.

It did make me laugh, so i have to call it a success

Is that title intentionally terrible?

Scepticism has been weaponized by anti intellectualism. The demand that alternative facts be taken seriously has been coming for a while. The most popular comment on r/science was always ‘correllation does not equal causation’ and it was treated like esoteric wisdom, and a spell that invalidates all of scientific research. This law is the natural consequence. Good luck Americans.

It’s

Try mixing some mirin or chinese cooking wine into your soy sauce. It could work.

Ok, then stop making those ‘male only’ spaces places where women are employed as sex objects and men are excluding their female colleagues from networking whilst engaging in a bit of fun sexual harrassment.

Im sorry but if the nazis dont hate you for who you are then who are you? Because they hate everyone who isn’t them.

I genuinely have no idea what you’re trying to communicate.

If you can explain the existance of existance then i’m all ears, if you can prove it with the scientific method then you might as well be god. I’m just an agnostic atheist who happily sees the whole damn shebang as a big wtf.

Yes. My point was that if the universe were a little different then we’d also be a little different. It’s all a weird crazy miracle though. Anything existing at all, or nothing existing, all incomprehensible, like magic.

And how should women help with male loneliness? Do you want a comfort woman assigned to you? Noone is entitled to a relationship.

Your problem is thinking that wearing blue is masculine and baking is feminine. Neither of those things are weak either.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/03/south-korea-fertility-rate-misogyny-feminism/673435/

If the chaos had lined up a bit later, or a bit earlier, we might not exist. Everything might be a bit different, almost as if this slightly different universe was perfectly designed for the slightly different creatures living in it. Magic.

From wikipedia:

In the field of psychology, cognitive dissonance is the perception of contradictory information and the mental toll of it. Relevant items of information include a person’s actions, feelings, ideas, beliefs, values, and things in the environment. Cognitive dissonance is typically experienced as psychological stress when persons participate in an action that goes against one or more of those things.[1] According to this theory, when two actions or ideas are not psychologically consistent with each other, people do all in their power to change them until they become consistent.[1][2] The discomfort is triggered by the person’s belief clashing with new information perceived, wherein the individual tries to find a way to resolve the contradiction to reduce their discomfort.

Religious scientists do not experience cognitive dissonance if they don’t view religion and science as incompatible, and apparently many of them don’t. Cognitive dissonance is not the same as hypocrisy. Some of those scientists may have experienced cognitive dissonance in the past but they have long since found a way of reconciling the scientific method with a belief in god.

The fact that getting your brain removed is the worse option does not change my point about consent.

Women are also sentient beings who do not consent to deepfake porn but apparently consent only matters when op says it matters.