Sometimes. Though via a different method. Which always causes utter confusion when anyone comes to the US and has to deal with the tipping culture of it being practically mandatory and done in a weird way, where it’s added on to the bill.
I don’t want the money going to the company I want it going to the employees, why would I have it added on to the bill, that’s so weird.
In the UK if you want to tip someone you pay your bill and then you leave them some physical cash.
They did create the problem. When they close the safe routes inevitably it meant that people started coming over on the dreaded “small boats”. Rather than the approved method of asking for asylum, then being granted asylum, and then coming over on the ferry.
The issue isn’t that people want to come and live in the UK the issue is that people who want to come and live in the UK are not being given legal methods to do so. It’s not like these methods didn’t exist, the Tories removed them
That’s how she behaves when being interviewed by a friendly interviewer. PMQs is going to be funny as hell.
It’s perfectly understandable. Why were you tripping up with it?
She’s exceeding expectations. I didn’t think she would fail so quickly I thought it would take at least a week.
Human nature is a lot more complicated than you think. Badenoch as a black woman, has managed to be both racist and misogynistic, while not seeing any issue with that.
If a black woman can be racist then I guess the conservative electorate are okay with that. For now anyway, I still have my doubts about her long-term survival.
I’ve read that comment five times and I have absolutely no idea what you’re trying to say.
I love her Fujitsu postal bug truther stance. It’s so wonderfully unhinged!
As far as I am aware she has never publicly made any statement about the post office scandal. I can imagine that if she did make a statement it would not be very coherent, but since I do not believe one has been made I’m not sure what you are referring to.
Given how Starmer’s neolib Labour
You need to look up neoliberalism because you clearly don’t know what it is.
decided they want to be the Truss/Sunak Tories on policy
What? Seriously what the actual hell does that mean? Truss didn’t even have any policies she was only around for about 4 minutes. Meanwhile Sunak’s policies altered depending on who the last person he talked to was.
she has a non-0 chance of becoming PM this decade!
The conservatives lost the election because they dicked around with the economy, slashed social benefits, messed about during the worst cost of living crisis in a generation, and engaged in culture war nonsense rather than actually dealing with the very real crisis that was unfolding in front of them. She is literally more of the same, an extremist who is constantly going off on her hunt to eradicate “wokism”. Which is the evil boogeyman of the hard right.
So because she’s the worst example of the previous administration, she’s going to become PM. Are you drunk?
The only way the conservatives are going to get back into power is if they convince everyone that they’ve got rid of all of the extremist rubbish, and are now capable of acting like a real political party with adults. Electing an extremist is pretty much the opposite of doing that.
No he won’t. They’ve got four seats, one of which doesn’t really count because his support is just a holdover from him being a conservative, that’s not exactly the makings of a political dynasty.
Also can Nigel Farage even be arsed?
There’s plenty of conservative voters who are not raging racists. At least there used to be, since there isn’t much space for them in the party anymore they’ve gone to the Lib Dems for the most part
It’s really stupid because all it will result in is Laborer raising taxes on the rich. Which presumably the rich didn’t want to happen.
He’s not exactly thinking several moves ahead here is he.
My understanding is that this is actually a completely different black hole to the one we already know about.
We already know there’s 22 billion missing, apparently this is a totally different bunch of missing money.
Councils to sort dumping of fridges, mattresses and broken cars
This seems to be a standard attack strategy of Tories. 30p kept going on about it before he got kicked out of the party.
It’s like they think It’s everyone’s number one concern or something. It’s really weird.
What does an instant fine mean anyway?
Like they have to pay it on the bus they’re not allowed to get off until they’ve paid the fine.
Literally all of these things are because of his governments decision to cut funding from everything.
People riding bikes on the pavement because there are no safe bike lanes for them to be in, either because there are no bike lanes at all, or because there are cars parked in the bike lanes because the law is not enforced.
Pavements get replaced with tarmac because local councils don’t have money to do it properly.
There’s a huge amount of litter on the streets because local councils don’t have the money to clean it up and also because there’s no bins anymore.
There’s so much graffiti everywhere because there’s no police. There is police because there’s no funding.
The article is in the telegraph. So that’s the lie right there.
It’s probably better to find a non-partisan news source, thing with a bit more integrity like the Kremlin times or something
Weirdly he seems to have a problem with expressing things. If you actually look at their policies they’re pretty good it’s just they suck at communicating them to the general public.
Right and what about all of the terrorist attacks that were committed by British nationals?
Do people in your family actually have positive feelings about you or are they kind of embarrassed every time you walk in the room?
Your justification for your hard right extremist attitude notwithstanding I noticed you have not actually provided evidence. I find this highly suspicious of your personal belief system. Your personal belief system being one that has a tendency to make people pariah’s without much in the way of logic or discourse.
So I again ask for you to provide some evidence.
I interestingly note that since you weren’t the person who originally made the comment you have waded into this argument with an uninformed and quite frankly abhorrent opinion without any defense.
When she said that the Tory party donor that made those comments about Diane Abbott should be excused.
Since when was she given authorization to make that determination? She wasn’t the offended party she wasn’t the threatened party and the individual who made the comment isn’t even an MP so she’s got absolutely no jurisdiction whatsoever to forgive anyone.