!explainlikeiamfive@lemmy.world better link format
!explainlikeiamfive@lemmy.world better link format
Is that how this works? I vote to keep potatoes.
Appears to be cake flavored ice cream in the thumbnail
That’s okay, I know how to help the bees against the honey wolverines
As if businesses are doing things for long term sustainability
We Americans are gonna be real confused on November 18th when the rest of the world is like “bro we told you the exact date this would happen”
On a side note, imagine being the first person to ever hear a recording of their own voice. Would they have known that how we hear ourselves isn’t what others hear, or would they chalk it up to a flaw in the nascent technology?
Wonder if that’s browser specific or version specific, because that’s not how I’m seeing it in Chrome on Windows 10
Look at this guy with his functioning brain that never forgets something just by walking 10 feet
They used to do some fucked up stuff. They still do, but they used to too.
Wouldn’t someone still have to deliberately click a malicious link to install it? Wouldn’t anyone working for such an agency be educated enough about these threats not to do so?
lol, lmao even. I worked IT for a hospital network for about 4 years. Doctors aren’t any smarter than anyone else when it comes to using a computer, because it’s not what they spent all their years studying. People click on dumb shit they shouldn’t all the time, doesn’t matter how “smart” they’re supposed to be.
Obviously depends on jurisdiction, but I doubt it (obligatory IANAL).
But should it be? Well, maybe not a felony, but otherwise yeah, fuck people that fuck with food service workers.
Glad I’m not the only one thinking this
This is an intrusive thought I can get behind. Time to give those printers what they deserve: torture.
So looking at your would-be-a-table-if-formatting-allowed, I noticed the net winning was close to 1/3 of the net wager. Given that the premise is tripling a losing bet, I thought it a little too convenient to have an expected profit of 1/3 so I recreated the table in a spreadsheet then started tinkering with the multiplier after a loss. I’m not smart enough to explain why it’s the case, but it appears that the limit of the net winnings / net wager as your number of bets increases is n-2 / n, where n is the factor you multiply by after losing a bet.
Only when O’Brien makes it
If I haven’t heard of it, it’s new to me!