![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/913b482d-9012-449f-bc87-b1f4463e7154.jpeg)
Couldn’t an AI do the same?
And disclaimer, I’m not a fan of the current iteration of “AIs.” I’m just trying to understand why coding and testing would be an issue if done by some tool.
Couldn’t an AI do the same?
And disclaimer, I’m not a fan of the current iteration of “AIs.” I’m just trying to understand why coding and testing would be an issue if done by some tool.
Hm, but isn’t usually the same developer who writes the code and the test?
Why would it be an issue if an AI does the same?
Why is this garbage in a science community?
Where’s the study? The experiments? The research?
Independence issue?
Haha yeah, I see how that could be entertaining.
But eh.
This is off-topic.
That’s a red herring. I don’t care about the original post because, like you pointed out, it’s about entertainment, not science.
Back to the original question I asked the parent poster, I’d like to know what value would bring two experienced astronauts debating a flat earth argument.
Um… yes?
For millennia.
This is nothing new.
The human race is not dying lol! Per evolutionary theory, it’s skiing quite well. Billions of us on Earth right now - and counting!
Why is this in a science community?
I want to read real science content here.
And who are these ping pong players?
Hopefully they didn’t just limit the population to silicon valley.
Why would it be more concerning?
Everything happening in the universe is “natural phenomena.” If we can’t explain it, we don’t have enough information.
Oh, I do this all the time. Might be age, then!
Please expand. I’ll never be a father, but I’m curious.
Or are you referring to dad jokes?
You are on point with your last sentence.
When something happens and we perceive it, we think of the situation. Yes, yes, technically it’s the brain doing the thinking, but our brain is us, not something separate.
So a better phrase would be the one you mentioned. “When we notice this mimicry, our brains activate such and such regions.”
No, I think it’s the fact that we think with our brains. The brain in a person is not some separate entity. It practically is us. So if someone says “my brain thinks it’s getting late” sounds stupid. “I think it’s getting late” sounds fine.
what does our brain really think of these mimicry attempts?
There’s something stupid-sounding about this sentence, though I can’t quite pinpoint it.
Also, I wonder how they controlled for confounding factors. The research indicates that our brains react differently to “fake voices.” How does it react to real voices played with low quality audio (e.g. through a telephone, or AM radio)? What about natural voices that are “ugly” or odd sounding? Speech impediments? Voices in a big hall with lots of reverberation? What about fake voices in an environment with a lot of background noise?
If they controlled for all that, then cool.
Lol we’ve all been there, friend!
I think you’re taking this whole thing too seriously.
People can do whatever they want for the lulz.
Ok! Will do.