Downvotes rewarded with hugs.

  • 1 Post
  • 123 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 30th, 2023

help-circle

  • I’m starting to see a pattern in modern Trek here. We’re used to seeing shows made by committee, but the rate that key creative people are being swapped out and their ideas corrupted as they’re passed on is just disconcerting:

    Alex Kurtzman, James Duff, and I believe maybe one other writer was involved at the time, and James really wanted it to be a Borg spin-off. […] But had Patrick not done it, some kind of show about the Borg would have happened. It would not have been Picard, it would have been a show about the Borg. […] And James left the show before they began filming. He had a creative differences and left, I think, weeks before I even began. I’d signed my contract, and the people that were left, I think, then made that decision [that Hugh was getting killed off] without my being told or even knowing about it through gossip.

    Never mind that actors aren’t told in advance what will happen to their characters, I get a feeling that writers make things up on the fly while actually shooting fairly serialised seasons. We see Bryan Fuller being removed from Disco while it’s in preproduction, then Berg and Harberts being fired mid-season two.

    As somebody who loved early Discovery and only hate watches the kitschy car crash of Strange new worlds, that sort of subtext gives me really bad vibes off the current Trek productions.

    And who is left once the dust settles. Too often we see Akiva Goldsman getting pulled in to “save” shows and,for all his Academy Award winning “A beautiful mind” glory, he seems to mostly play fantasy football with Star Trek.

    Goldsman’s Star trek tributes were cutesy when he did them on Fringe, but now that he’s a mover on the actual franchise, fucking up continuities of the TOS roster and every bit of canon about the Gorn? Not so much.




  • The quality about the fediverse that I appreciate the most is the fact that nobody on any of its platforms raised an eyebrow at having a rainbow-coloured pentagram for a logo, until the first Twitter exodus when some newcomer primed for spotting the mildest of outrage-by-proxy gasped, “Have you seen this? Somebody might get upset!”

    Meanwhile, the pentagram has been warding off hyperbolic fundamentalists since 2018. The fediverse is much chiller without them. 🤘





  • Handles@leminal.spacetoFediverse@lemmy.mlA symbol for the ⁂ fediverse
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    …and this latest proposal certainly isn’t either of those things.

    This logo is really unpopular

    Source? I’ve only ever seen a handful of strawman arguments that “I’m not offended by the vague resemblance to a pentagram/use of rainbow colours implying LGBTQ+ support, but somebody might be”, but its fairly wide adoption suggests that most people — myself included — actually like it.