Is it as bad for your health as hydrogenated oils?
Is it as bad for your health as hydrogenated oils?
A process pool means extra copying of data around which incurs a huge cost and this is made worse by the tendency for parallel-processing-friendly workloads often consisting of large amounts of data.
Usually, but when it isn’t then you’ve got a bottleneck. Multithreaded performance is a major weak point if you need to do any processing that isn’t handled by one of the libraries.
That depends on what the application needs to do. There’s a reason why all performance-critical libraries for Python aren’t written in Python.
C is almost the perfect subset for me, but then I miss templates (almost exclusively for defining generic data structures) and automatic cleanup. That’s why I’m so interested in Zig with its comptime and defer features.
The graph goes up for me when I find my comfortable little subset of C++ but goes back down when I encounter other people’s comfortable little subset of C++ or when I find/remember another footgun I didn’t know/forgot about.
Bunch of amateurs. Don’t they know that the proper approach is to flood the internet with articles of “the economy is doing amazing, you peasants just don’t know it”?
Ah okay, thanks for the info!
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, but shit like this is what prevents people from taking preventative measures.
What does being on the list mean? According to the article, Ukraine is happy to sell to China anyway.
But they already had the intelligence necessary to prevent that attack, it’s just that bush ignored it.
The guy who made a show where he becomes president clearly had no political ambitions.
What were they doing in Jordan?
Taking a “this is justified because fuck Russia” line of logic to its logical conclusion is not the same as equating data loss to loss of human life.
Following that logic, civilians should be fair game because “Russia can get fucked”.
The story itself is about supposed disinformation which is a super power manipulating “a dumb mass” but for some reason you take issue with me pointing out an influence but not the article pointing out an influence. Then you contradict yourself by assuming that I must be employed by the Chinese, as if there is no “peoples will” and that I couldn’t possibly be pointing out something I observed myself.
Hell yeah, score another point for the anti-science team!
Is this code for the US-favored candidate winning?
They haven’t ruled on that yet.
Prehistoric lego.