I don’t know who needs to hear this, but Python, like most languages, can be as complex as you make it.
I don’t know who needs to hear this, but Python, like most languages, can be as complex as you make it.
Brother, life is too short not to leave when you want.
Yeah I mean, I get that, but that’s not what I meant. I appreciate the message for those that might not understand our economy isn’t ideal.
We pour a ton of money into the military, making it a very viable way to cross economic levels.
I don’t think the actual act of serving is all that bad, it becomes less serious when everyone has to do it, however it does go against principles of the country and truly being free. The US has one of the best and largest all volunteer military and that should be something to celebrate, not be moan.
That being said we celebrate that all the damn time, probably a little too much, honestly.
Buckshot roulette had me running through probabilities again.
At least these bastards are showing everyone who they are and what they plan to continue doing to this country as long as they’re in the driver seat.
Very informative, I think people will learn from what you’re saying, but it doesn’t really matter to what I’m saying.
Yes, absolutely, consider the human element in your data encryption and protection schemes and implementations.
Beating someone with a pipe is a joke, but not really defeating an algorithm.
I appreciate the explaination, that’s a cool scheme, but what I saying is the human leaking the key is not the fault of the algorithm.
Everyone and everything is, on a very pedantic level, weak to getting their ass beat lol
That doesn’t make it crypt analysis
Doesn’t break the algorithm though, you would just have the key and then can use the algorithm (that still works!) to decrypt data.
Also you’re talking about one class of cryptography, the concept of key knowledge varies between algorithms.
My point is an attacker having knowledge of the key is a compromise, not a successful break of the algorithm…
“the attacker beat my ass until I gave them the key”, doesn’t mean people should stop using AES or even RSA, for example.
No, really though, where’s it from?
Where is this from? I don’t think exposing the key breaks most crypto algorithms, it should still be doing its job.
I know this is supposed to be humorous, but there’s a reason why these languages can, and are doing what they’re doing.
Core dumps are also worth learning about, they’re really helpful if you understand them.
All the hostages they didn’t already recklessly kill right?
It’s a gross perspective this person must have to say this with a straight face. The reasoning really shows how out of touch with the harsh reality many people live in.
We should be striving for more free time, and life enjoyment.
Exactly, all I’m saying is that there are people out there that enjoy re-imagining or updating of good content. The numbers don’t lie, and people enjoying something you criticize doesn’t make them stupid.
Both new IP and remakes can co-exist. I agree companies want to take the less risky option, but content creation (both in games and movies) has become more accessible than ever.
Why can’t people make what they want to make, and if you’re not interested, don’t buy it? I understand being frustrated by the lack of new original IP, but that doesn’t mean they can’t both exist.
It’s exhausting listening to the overwhelming negativity some people put out there when no one is hurting them.
Listen, I see from what you said, what your worldview and values are, and I’m here to remind you that they’re wrong.
/s
Is this some kind of pattern around the world? Did something start it or is it just a natural culture pathway? I’m always reminded of how you can’t criticize even your own country without being labeled unpatriotic.
Java when you don’t put in a try catch, vs Template<typename T> in Cpp