ithas

Slightly off-topic but recently I saw a bunch of these under the rayshader tag on mastodon, seems like https://fosstodon.org/@terence posts a lot of them if you want to check some out (edit: I might want to clarify that they are likely generated based on data rather than photos from space, though)

I would sort of expect it to be the stuff we struggle to get rid of, like fungi and weeds. So maybe mushrooms and dandelions? This is just a wild guess, and obviously you couldn’t live off them forever.

Maybe it’s a focal length difference? Example

Seems to be from here: https://drleviharrison.com/mouse-sensitivity-gaming-rsi/

So at the very least is a real person and appears accurate to his claims

In observing high sensitivity play, it is clear that there is more of an isolation of the hand and wrist in regards to movement. These players will flick their wrists aggressively, hence engaging the anatomical structures that are at risk for developing RSI including the carpal tunnel, the wrist, joints, tendons, etc.

Reads as though the shorter, violent action of wrist flicking is claimed to be more damaging than constant, slower movement.

Which I definitely prefer. The chatgpt thing in the OP had me thinking -I- was hallucinating. I’ve always felt it takes less hand movement to move across the screen with acceleration

People turn it off?! Surely it is faster with acceleration rather than without?! I guess I can try, I have now disabled enhance pointer precision in windows. What I can say is, it does actually seem to go faster I expected. I then tried to get back to the checkbox to turn it back on and completely overshot the selection box and then overcorrected my overcorrection. Now I’m curious what most people use.

I have a metal coffee table that I tap every time I get up. Maybe something similar if not that, like an end table next to your couch?

8:00 almost slipped by me there