Couldn’t the massive fires (energy and compounds generated) exacerbate these values?
Don’t make me say what I didn’t say.
Yes, people didn’t get my comment. We don’t have all the choice and luxury to work for a great company or good project. In old Europe, a 1 WFH was an ultimate privilege before COVID. Nowadays, It should be choice, I don’t mind coming 2 days a week but it to be a “mandatory minimal” 2 days is a bit ridiculous. Still, If I have my own or max 4 seats offices, I’ll be okay with it.
jeez, using boomer at every sauces is so cringe. grow up, little fluid-anime keyboard warrior.
I could trade my WFH for a room with a view and a door. :) fuck openspace and flexdesks!
what about pharmaceutics ? “oh no, they couldn’t, it is heavily regulated and it is science, b*tch!”
definitely, this and even gas. Being directly connected to the grid is a bit insane, when you think about it.
Thank you, but I was talking about heat generated by the fires and compound build-up (eg: co2), while the last one might bring its effects later.
Just to be sure, I talk about these figures, not the global climate deregulation.