Lemmy is tree-structured. Can’t talk over nobody.
Lemmy is tree-structured. Can’t talk over nobody.
Removed by mod
They just said they do not trust it though.
How many transgender mass-shooters have there even been? Zero? One?
I assume they just spew this fake news in order to make people hear “trans shooter” over and over again until they think it’s a pattern.
i like the last one
According to the article:
[Lowe’s] earned a perfect score in HRC’s most recent corporate equity index that examines its policies protecting LGBTQ workers.
This is true in Lua as well (substituting ‘nil’ for 'null)
(Sincerely, someone who doesn’t floss)
Docs and testing have no bravado, but they’re important. If they’re dragging you down, use your problem-solving brain and find a way to make them work for you.
You’re probably right about that. It is irritating though that we’ve added more syllables.
I’m just grumpy because I don’t like random change for no reason. I think I’m probably in the 99th percentile for how irritated I get when software or a website changes its layout. I also haven’t seen any trustworthy anecdotes of people who find the term blacklist/whitelist offensive to them, but I don’t really go looking either. Perhaps I should.
I think people should be concerned about things on others’ behalfs. We all need to stick together.
This situation is a send-up though. Totally not a concern.
Evil forces of darkness and good forces of light is engrained into our cultural DNA. Night=dangerous, day=safe is just something you have to learn early as a woman, it is a fact of society and we can’t pretend it isn’t.
Dark lord, black rider, white knight… why focus on whitelist/blacklist specifically?
Why is this programmer humour?
But why not apply that logic to “The ethical thing is not to vote for someone who is funding a genocide, no matter how much he helps your marginalized group”?
Pragmatically, they’re endorsing the lesser of two evils to encourage people to vote for the lesser of two evils. They think Biden being in office will be much better for LGBT people than Trump will be, to the point that it’s worth it to spend millions to encourage votes for Biden. Third parties are very unlikely to win, so it’s not worth it; they could spend millions on some other project to more directly help LGBT people.
If you think it’s OK to vote for the lesser of two evils, then I don’t see why you draw the line at endorsing the lesser of two evils.
Why does a vote for a war criminal necessarily imply a vote for war crimes? Trump is also a war criminal, and there are only three options (vote: biden, neither, trump) – all three will result in a war criminal in office.
This is an earnest question btw. I don’t understand your perspective.
Removed by mod