If you like international and eclectic news, come and join me at @worldwithoutus (Link for Lemmy = worldwithoutus).

I’ve also started helping out at @worldnews, (Link for Lemmy = worldnews), @movies, (Lemmy = movies), and am a ghost at @13thfloor (Lemmy = 13th Floor).

  • 28 Posts
  • 1.04K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle
  • They’re basically fancy ways of saying “non white”.

    There’s a use case for making that distinction but it’s a lot narrower than expecting people to self-identify in those terms.

    Which, within that use case (e.g talking about wide and systemic oppression by white-led cultures) I guess that could be like the argument some people from certain countries have made that “Third World” is useful term because it does retain the history of its useage, whereas when it’s exchanged for terms like LDCs>Global South>LICs>etc that sort of obscures the historical material conditions and relational aspects which inform the present. Or something.











  • I think it’s more that they don’t want their own country to aid in a genocide. Even if the genocide could still happen without you, that’s no reason to give up and support it.

    That said,

    • As a political ally the US protects Israel from being attacked by its neighbours

    • it would also block any intervention by the UN

    • Since Oct 7 the US has done over 200 arms deals with Israel and has provided at least 1,800 of the numerous 2,000 pound bombs they are hitting Gaza with (for reference the US only dropped one 2,000 pound bomb on Islamic State in its entire conflict with it)

    • The US has also shared military intelligence/surveillance data with Israel, which is using AI to target Palestinians


  • Your topic’s a false premise. First of all it’s totally valid to criticize someone for something that couldn’t apply in the current situation, because what’s being criticized is the decisions and attitudes that their actions reveal.

    Meta’s refusal to moderate a website they control after multiple warnings that it was being used to incite genocide speaks to their institutional values, accountability, and culture.

    By contrast, plenty of instance owners have shown responsibility, accountability, and good faith about admins moderating the instances they control.

    try to be accurate and concise.

    Lol that’s condescending, and it’s also a bit offputting. I come here to bloviate thank you very much. :)

    The thing is though, I’m not part of the wider conversation about facebook above. You glommed onto a very simple, very specific point I made to someone else about the human impact of social media incitements to genocide.

    What Meta did to the ICC isn’t even related to my above link (which is about the Tigray genocide, not the Myanmar genocide). But it’s well-documented, and I’m not interested in rehashing it here.