Ein 👍 von mir:

  • Meinung, die ich teile
  • Beiträge, die mehr Aufmerksamkeit verdienen

Weder ein 👍, noch ein 👎 von mir:

  • Andere Meinung
  • Beiträge, die ich uninteressant finde

Ein 👎 von mir:

  • Diskriminierung
  • Trollen
  • Irrationalität + Faktenleugnung
  • 0 Posts
  • 41 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle








  • No one and both.

    Sounds weird, but both countries would have developed better without the war. So no one.

    But also both, because it will probably result in a situation in which both parties celebrate victory. The smallest possible victory for Russia could be “we defeated a few ‘Nazis’” and the smallest possible victory of Ukraine could be “They took only parts of our land”.





  • I don’t know why you are getting so defensive and upset.

    Why do you think that? You are sharing your arguments, I’m sharing mine… And I’m even able to listen to other arguments without downvoting them.

    Is anyone who defends Palestine some sort of shadowy sinister bearded brown Hamas supporter?

    What is this question? Did you read this above?

    Why not just “palestine will be free”? Why not “Protect palestine”? Why not “Stop killing civilians!”? I’d support all of that.


    Do go out and touch some grass…

    Nice… Sure, I’m the person" who gets upset"… Sorry for sharing arguments with you and trying to explain you why others interpret this sentence differently.



  • Gaza and west bank will be free, doesn’t make a great slogan.

    Why not just “palestine will be free”? Why not “Protect palestine”? Why not “Stop killing civilians!”? I’d support all of that. But why adding the highly controversial beginning that can be understood as “let’s take back Israel territory and connect Westback + Gaza” or even “Let’s delete Israel”?

    How is that antisemitic?

    I would not even call it antisemitic… It’s not primarily against the religion. I’d call it “Anti Israel rhetoric”.

    I don’t understand what you are trying to achieve here. Chanting something that has a huge potential to be misunderstood and back-paddling afterwards does not help anyone. You talked about the far right… In Germany, that’s exactly their strategy. Saying stuff like “We will hunt politicians” or “In some cases, we’d have to shoot migrants at the border” and when they got the full attention, they back-paddle “Wasn’t meant like that… You misunderstood us”…

    There are people in this area (like Hamas) who have the primary goal to eradicate Israel. They support that sentence, but interpret it differently than you and I think, you know that.

    IMO, this conflict is too terrible to throw in this sentence that has always been “at least controversial”.