We used to use Redmine and it was a fantastic piece of software.
We used to use Redmine and it was a fantastic piece of software.
I’m not sure that’s the fault of XML though.
It’s more the fault of the implementation and documentation.
We have a WCF service with an odd configuration and nobody has been able to integrate with it that didn’t use Microsoft tools. It’s definitely not XML’s fault.
(That service has been replaced with a REST API now)
It seems that they intend Microsoft Loop to be the collaborative notes app now.
It’s replaced OneNote as the meeting notes app and it has more flexible access control.
Currently they also only have one version as it’s a progressive web app (that might change with time though).
I guess that that’s all that matters.
Did it take time to get used to or did it work straight away?
Is it saying that the PHP developers are kids and the C++ developer is acting as their parent?
I’m not sure.
If you want to fork the repo then you make a commit to the original repo giving yourself rights then you make the fork and you’re golden.
I don’t understand why people think that it’s acceptable.
As developers, we’ve had it drummed into us from day one that variable names are important and shouldn’t be one or two letters.
Yet developers deliberately alias an easy to read table name such as “customer” into “c” because that’s the first letter of the table. I’m sure that it’s more work to do that with auto completion meaning that you don’t even need to type out “customer”.
It’s not two years. It’s five years and they voted on whether to strike two years ago.
I thought that they’d towed that beyond the environment. How did it get back?
Yeah.
They could literally have a “secret” document say not to do genocide followed up by a really secret document saying to ignore the previous document.
There’s no way that we can trust the documents when they can pick and choose the documents that they show.
They also can’t give the court unrestricted access to all their secret documents because that would be a serious security issue so they’re not in a good position really.
I like the scope creep there:
They should sell it for biomass fuel. :)
It says in the email that you can pay extra for ad free.
But “the people” didn’t decide on the deal because they were only given two choices and the interpretation of “leave” was down to the Government and Parliament.
It would have been much better to get experts together to decide what options there were and how each one affected us and for that information to be made available to everyone so that Parliament could have had a complete view of the various options that Government was considering.
Instead they hid away and came up with a single version of Brexit that got shot down and then they still triggered the leave process anyway.
They should have taken years to come up with a leave plan before triggering the leave process instead of the mess that happened.
Edit: and if this process determined that it really was a shit idea then act on that by either having a second referendum or just deciding that it was a bad idea and not doing it.
I think that the key part is that the government tried to come up with a Brexit plan on their own but couldn’t. They even started negotiating with the EU before they knew what they wanted and could get passed Parliament.
They wasted the best part of a year coming up with a single plan only to get it shot down because it didn’t match what most MPs wanted. It couldn’t because there were ten or twelve different versions of Brexit ranging from leaving in name only to just not even doing a deal with the EU at all.
Had they created a study group to analyse the options and the consequences of each they could have come up with a coherent plan with Parliament so that they’d know what everyone wanted before starting negotiations with the EU.
The problem was that nobody in the UK did an effective job of arguing for remain. They were caught napping because they were convinced that people wouldn’t want to leave.
When they realised that we were in danger of voting to leave it was too late.
Obviously, people in the EU said that it was a bad idea but they obviously would say that because we’re “sending them £350 million a week” and they wouldn’t want to lose that.
But not to be PM right away. Let some other sucker take that job and fuck it up (because it’s an impossible task as there are a dozen different ideas of Brexit) then he can come along later once most of the dust has settled.
I think that people tend to take just one or two reference points to decide things like this because it’s too complicated to consider them all.
The points that might have led people to believe that the NHS was improved by Brexit are that we were told that leaving the EU gave us the ability to approve and buy the COVID vaccine more quickly and that we did seem to get it more quickly than the EU.
I imagine that the model was created by elite people and so didn’t actually fail but behaved as designed.
Maybe it’s not changed then because I was using it in the early 2000s. 😀