they should consult economists
remember when dems made fun of trump for “chi-na” stuff? good times
hypothetically? small table of binary flags which comment trees to show/hide. But yeah too complicated, especially who hosts the main full tree of comments :(
I mean why? If you post topic of interest for several instances, you would have one discussion with differing viewpoints (but not too different, cause those instances would be cross-blocked). Maybe i don’t understand the purpose of crossposts now then, why would you cross post if people will see it anyways on some instance?
I actually have a question: is it possible to make crossposts more unifying (i.e. crossposted posts gets the same page with comments from across lemm) instead of splintering. It sounds kinda nightmarish on who hosts what and blocking things, but maybe it can be done?
Brave guy, although he shouldn’t be.
NYT continuing its tradition being shit.
Kinda funny that imf for the last 2 years has been like: europe, pls spend, for fucks sake; and europe is like “austerity yesterday, austerity today, austerity tomorrow” mode
Trump be like “fuck china, build the wall, eu should pay for nato, dig more oil” and dems be like: i serve the amerikkkan empire
Amazing
IDF killed vastly more people than hamas, and civilian/combatant ratio for idf is worse than for hamas. Thus hamas is more moral force in the conflict.
So like, autoloan only machine-of-death-loan. Prolly cb rates fucked it up
TFW crime doesn’t pay
Wer hat uns verraten?
Gotta kill more people for the blood god of empire
Robots seeing any person in sandstone building with sparse vegetation around 👿
reform is a good whipping tool tbh, can regulate elections from outside by strategically abstaining (2019) or participating in elections (2024)