![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://startrek.website/pictrs/image/ccbc1d32-aa21-4d26-bb28-42e63bd83083.png)
I don’t watch Star Trek, but I want to pitch in that the only episode I’ve ever seen is Trouble With Tribbles and I enjoyed it.
I don’t watch Star Trek, but I want to pitch in that the only episode I’ve ever seen is Trouble With Tribbles and I enjoyed it.
It’s git terminology which boils down to that anyone can contribute to the source code if the community approves the changes made.
Well you can feed more people with one cow’s life than one dog’s life.
Not that it’s right that either should have to be sacrificed anymore.
The truth is not a weird hill.
We have the technology!
Others may ask, “Isn’t it your responsibility to provide context, particularly on thorny issues such as this one?” To that, we merely say: No, shut up. You’re being annoying.
This article is good, I recommend the read.
Same boat here haha
In the US (not UK, sorry!) It is entirely dependent on the family that raised you. In some households it’s just another word, and in others it is a curse word. In my experience the households that consider it a curse are less common.
This caught me off guard when I was roughly your age and got in trouble for it when visiting a friend. I thought it was a regular word and was scolded in front of others for it. I had no clue what was going on because nobody would tell me what word it was for a while.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jun/29/chinese-spy-balloon-shot-information-biden
This article further quotes that Pentagon spokesperson, who specified that the balloon did not send data back to China due to mitigation efforts that the US took.
Additionally, https://www.wsj.com/articles/chinese-balloon-used-american-tech-to-spy-on-americans-2e3f5039 having off the shelf parts does not necessarily mean it was a regular weather balloon. It took photos and videos, potentially of some of the secure areas it just happened to fly over. Note that while this article claims it used US gear, the included Pentagon quotes don’t back that claim up, instead saying past balloons used off the shelf US equipment.
I have no clue what you’re trying to say in your text, but other countries (namely Canada) did also spot Chinese balloons above their territory. There was also evidence that these balloons had equipment on board that did not line up with what is expected on a weather balloon.
Update the site with mcafees phone number and only have the real one behind a click through you have to read